Cuffed endotracheal tubes in infants less than 3 kg: A retrospective cohort study.

Paediatr Anaesth

Chair in Biostatistics, Institute for Health Research, University of Notre Dame, Perth, WA, Australia.

Published: March 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared outcomes between cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tubes in neonates under 3 kg, highlighting short-term effects in a neonatal intensive care setting.
  • Results showed no significant differences in weight, intubation duration, or major complications between both groups, although gestational age and age at intubation varied.
  • The findings suggest that using cuffed endotracheal tubes in this population may be safe, but larger studies are needed for conclusive evidence.

Article Abstract

Background: Cuffed endotracheal tubes are being increasingly used in infants; however, current evidence in the literature mostly includes infants ≥ 3-kg weight.

Aims: The aim of this observational study was to compare the short-term outcomes with the use of Microcuff cuffed vs uncuffed endotracheal tubes in neonates < 3 kg.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study in a single-centre, tertiary children's hospital neonatal intensive care unit. The study included all infants < 3 kg receiving Microcuff cuffed endotracheal tubes over the period January 2015 to January 2016. Controls were all infants 2000-2999 g receiving an uncuffed endotracheal tube over the period September 2015 to January 2016.

Results: Twenty-three patients < 3 kg were intubated with cuffed endotracheal tubes. All were inserted in the operating room. Of 23 patients, 14 (60.9%) patients had the cuff inflated in the operating room and none subsequently in the neonatal intensive care unit. The group receiving cuffed endotracheal tubes was compared with 23 patients with uncuffed endotracheal tubes. There was no difference in weight (median 2620 g vs 2590 g, diff in median = 10, 95% CI -120, 130) or duration of intubation (median 27 vs 44 hours, diff in median = 17, 95% CI -5, 46). However, there was a significant difference in gestational age (median 37 vs 35 weeks, diff in median = -1, 95% CI -2, 0) and age at intubation (median 6 vs 0 days, diff in median = -4, 95% CI -10, -1). There were no significant differences in the rates of: change of endotracheal tube to find correct size (0/23 vs 4/23, P = .109, OR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.01, 1.41); median ventilator leak reading (0% [IQR 0%-12%] vs 0% [IQR 0%-5.5%], P = .201, diff in median = 0, 95% CI -5.5, 0); unplanned extubations (0/23 vs 2/23; atelectasis (4/23 vs 0/23; endotracheal tube blockage (0/23 vs 0/23; pneumonia (0/23 vs 0/23; or postextubation stridor (1/23 vs 2/23).

Conclusion: This retrospective study with a small sample size found that Microcuff cuffed endotracheal tubes may be safe in neonates < 3 kg. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to address this issue definitively.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.13311DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endotracheal tubes
32
cuffed endotracheal
24
diff median
20
median 95%
20
microcuff cuffed
12
uncuffed endotracheal
12
endotracheal tube
12
endotracheal
10
median
10
tubes
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!