A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Abatacept might increase bone mineral density at femoral neck for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: AIRTIGHT study. | LitMetric

We investigated the influence of abatacept (ABT) on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone metabolic markers (BMMs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to other biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). This prospective, comparative, non-randomized study (the AIRTIGHT study; UMIN000005570) investigated the effects of ABT and other bDMARDs on bone metabolism. A total of 165 RA patients were divided into ABT (n = 50) and non-ABT (n = 115). We evaluated percentage changes in BMD (%ΔBMD) at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Urinary levels of cross-linked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (uNTx) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) were used as markers of bone resorption and formation, respectively. No significant differences in 1-year completion rates were seen between ABT (64%) and non-ABT (72%; p = 0.387). The %ΔBMD at the femoral neck was significantly higher in the ABT group (0.97%) than in the non-ABT group (- 2.19%; p = 0.026). Whereas, no significant difference in %ΔBMD at the lumbar spine was observed between groups (ABT, - 0.40%; Non-ABT, - 1.67%; p = 0.524). No significant differences were observed in changes to uNTx or BAP. ABT treatment was significantly associated with increased BMD at the femoral neck (odds ratio (OR) 8.84; 95% CI 1.08-72.4; p = 0.04), and baseline lumbar osteoarthritis was significantly associated with BMD at the lumbar spine (OR 2.97; 95% CI 1.23-7.13; p = 0.02). The efficacy of ABT for increasing BMD at the femoral neck was superior to that of other bDMARDs. ABT may offer good efficacy for improving BMD at the femoral neck in patients with RA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-017-3922-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

femoral neck
24
lumbar spine
12
bmd femoral
12
abt
9
bone mineral
8
mineral density
8
neck patients
8
patients rheumatoid
8
rheumatoid arthritis
8
airtight study
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!