AI Article Synopsis

  • Phosphorus site assessment helps identify areas at risk of phosphorus loss in agriculture, crucial for managing water quality.
  • Current updates on phosphorus assessment tools in Pennsylvania focus on utilizing public GIS data to analyze soil and topographic variables, particularly near-stream areas.
  • Classification of topographic and soil groups within counties aids in managing near-stream agricultural lands while ensuring that future phosphorus index evaluations reflect Pennsylvania's diverse hydrogeomorphic conditions.

Article Abstract

Phosphorus (P) site assessment is used nationally and internationally to assess the vulnerability of agricultural fields to P loss and identify high-risk areas controlling watershed P export. Current efforts to update P site assessment tools must ensure that these tools are representative of the range of conditions to which they will be applied. We sought to identify key parameters available in public GIS data that are descriptive of potential source areas in Pennsylvania and that ensure that modifications of the P Index span all feasible parameter combinations. Relevant soil and topographic variables were compiled for Pennsylvania at 30-m resolution, and areas within 90 m of permanent streams were extracted. Within each county, -means and classification trees were used to identify and create classification rules for topoedaphic groups. Within counties, two to five groups adequately represented near-stream complexity, with available water capacity, hydraulic conductivity, and organic matter being the most important environmental variables. Discontinuities across soil survey boundaries made it impossible to develop clusterings beyond the county level. For county-scale research and management efforts, these groupings provide a manageable approach to identifying representative sites for near-stream agricultural lands. The full set of representative sites across the state enables evaluation of the P Index throughout the full hydrogeomorphic diversity of Pennsylvania. In future work, we can then combine a set of reasonable management practices with each of the main hydrogeomorphological regions resulting from this study and verify the revised P Index against expert knowledge and simulation results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2016.10.0416DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

site assessment
8
representative sites
8
analyzing within-county
4
within-county hydrogeomorphological
4
hydrogeomorphological characteristics
4
characteristics precursor
4
precursor phosphorus
4
phosphorus modifications
4
modifications phosphorus
4
phosphorus site
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!