Background: The relationship between driver blood alcohol concentration (BAC) and crash involvement is well understood. However, the role of alcohol use disorders (AUDs) (i.e., dependence or abuse) in crash occurrence, as distinguished from non-clinical heavy alcohol consumption, has not been adequately explored.
Methods: Data from the 2010-2011 Crash Risk Study conducted in Virginia Beach, VA, were used in this study. Drivers involved in crashes were compared with control drivers, and four drinker groups were examined: alcohol dependent, alcohol abusers, heavy drinkers, and all other current (i.e., normative) drinkers. Logistic regression analyses were conducted on two outcomes: having a moderate BAC (≥0.05 g/dl), and crash involvement.
Results: Overall, 2411 crash-involved and 5514 control drivers provided useable data, 52.4% of which were men and 70.8% Whites. The prevalence of drivers with AUDs was lower for the crash-involved drivers (8.7%) than for the control drivers (12.7%). Only heavy drinkers, but not abusive or dependent drinkers, were over four times more likely to drive with moderate BACs at nighttime. More important, at nighttime, the odds of crash involvement for dependent drinkers were only one third of those for normative drinkers. Daytime crashes, however, were more likely to involve normative drinkers than any of the other three drinker types.
Conclusions: Drivers with AUDs are not more likely than normative drinkers to drive with moderate BACs at night. After accounting for the influence of BAC, dependent drinkers have a lower risk of being involved in a crash, at any time of the day.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5803372 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.10.040 | DOI Listing |
Alcohol Clin Exp Res (Hoboken)
December 2024
Rutgers Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research, Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Background: Setting rules about alcohol use and minimizing its availability in the home are known effective parent-level strategies for reducing underage drinking risk. However, parents' restrictions and their perceptions of their child's alcohol access have rarely been considered in combination (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychol Addict Behav
September 2024
Louvain Experimental Psychopathology Research Group, Psychological Science Research Institute, UCLouvain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
June 2024
Department of Nursing, Fareast University, Eumseong 27601, Republic of Korea.
J Cancer Surviv
July 2024
Department of Research and Development, Netherlands, Comprehensive Cancer Organisation , Godebaldkwartier 419, 3511 DT, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Subst Use Misuse
July 2024
Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Objective: The relation is investigated between situational drinking norms which accept heavier drinking and the experience of harm from others' drinking. How does the experience of such harm relate to the acceptance of heavier drinking in drinking situations?
Methods: Respondents in a 2021 combined sample from random digitally dialed mobile phones and a panel survey of Australian adults ( = 2,574) were asked what level of drinking is acceptable in 11 social situations, including 3 "wet" situations where drinking is generally acceptable. Besides their own drinking patterns, respondents were also asked about their experience of harm from others' drinking in the last 12 months.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!