Professor Samuel David Gross (1805-1884) is considered as one of the founders of American surgery. He was a skillful surgeon who could excellently perform a lithotomy, an amputation, and a cataract surgery. He introduced many new surgical techniques and designed new surgical and medical instruments. He expertise was not limited to surgery alone; he also published studies concerning internal medicine, pathology, experimental physiology, and pharmacology. His most important treatise was his 2-volume work, A System of Surgery, Pathological, Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Operative (1861), which was a standard reference book in surgery in the United States during the second half of 19th century. Gross received many honors during his life. He was active in the operating room until his death.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1553350617750297 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Long term health outcomes in people with diabetes 12 months after hospitalisation with COVID-19 in the UK: a prospective cohort study.
EClinicalMedicine
January 2025
Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Diabetes Research Centre, Leicester General Hospital, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE5 4PW, UK.
Background: People with diabetes are at increased risk of hospitalisation, morbidity, and mortality following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Long-term outcomes for people with diabetes previously hospitalised with COVID-19 are, however, unknown. This study aimed to determine the longer-term physical and mental health effects of COVID-19 in people with and without diabetes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHospital Boarding Creates Critical Shortcomings in Disaster Preparedness.
Health Secur
January 2025
Michael Redlener, MD, FAEMS, is Medical Director, Mount Sinai West Department of Emergency Medicine; Co-Director, Center for Healthcare Readiness; and an Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine; all at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY.
Hospital patient boarding in emergency departments has reached unprecedented crisis levels over the past 4 years. Boarding and crowding has been demonstrated by prior literature to have adverse effects on patient care as well as increased associated costs. Importantly, the increase in hospital patient boarding has created critical shortcomings in disaster preparedness by limiting the capacity of emergency departments to respond to mass casualty incidents due to space and staffing constraints.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPrevalence of Current Clinical Leverage and Association with Perceived Coercion in Outpatient and Community Psychiatric Settings: A First in Canada Study.
Community Ment Health J
January 2025
Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Clinical leverages and pressures are often utilized in psychiatric treatment settings. Clinicians know they are controversial but think of them as useful and relatively harmless. Perception of coercion is known to be deleterious to therapeutic relationship and clinical outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPatient- and Family-Centered Outcomes After Intensive Care Unit Admission.
Am J Crit Care
January 2025
Eliotte L. Hirshberg is an assistant professor of pediatrics, Shock Trauma Intensive Care Unit, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah; Center for Humanizing Critical Care, Intermountain Health, Murray, Utah; Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah; and Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Background: Family satisfaction with intensive care is a measure of patient experience and patient-centered care. Among the factors that might influence family satisfaction are the timing of patient admittance to the intensive care unit (ICU), the ICU environment, and individual health care providers.
Objective: To evaluate family satisfaction with the ICU and to explore associations between satisfaction and specific characteristics of the ICU stay.
Tackling algorithmic bias and promoting transparency in health datasets: the STANDING Together consensus recommendations.
Lancet Digit Health
January 2025
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, School of Health Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Electronic address:
Article Synopsis
- There is a significant risk of reinforcing existing health inequalities in AI health technologies due to biases, primarily stemming from the datasets used.
- The STANDING Together recommendations focus on transparency in health datasets and proactive evaluation of their impacts on different population groups, informed by a comprehensive research process with over 350 global contributors.
- The 29 recommendations are divided into guidance for documenting health datasets and strategies for using them, aiming to identify and reduce algorithmic biases while promoting awareness of the inherent limitations in all datasets.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!