A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of effect of different disposable infection control barriers on light intensity of light-curing unit and microhardness of composite - An study. | LitMetric

Aims: This study evaluated effect of infection control barriers on light intensity (LI) of light-curing unit (LCU) and microhardness of composite.

Materials And Methods: Four different disposable barriers ( = 30) were tested against the control. LI for each barrier was measured with Lux meter. One hundred and fifty Teflon molds were equally divided into five groups of thirty each. Composite was filled in bulk in these molds and cured without and with barrier. Microhardness was evaluated on top and bottom surface of composite specimen with microhardness testing machine and hardness ratio (HR) was derived.

Statistical Analysis Used: One-way analysis of variance, Tukey's honestly significant difference test, and paired -test using SPSS version 18 software.

Results: All barriers had significantly reduced the baseline LI of LCU ( < 0.0001), but only Cure Elastic Steri-Shield and latex cut glove pieces (LCGP) significantly reduced the microhardness of the composite ( < 0.05). However, HR determined inadequate curing only with LCGP.

Conclusions: Although entire tested barrier significantly reduced the LI; none, except LCGP markedly affected the degree of cure of the composite.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5706319PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_171_16DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

infection control
8
control barriers
8
barriers light
8
light intensity
8
intensity light-curing
8
light-curing unit
8
microhardness composite
8
microhardness
5
composite
5
evaluation disposable
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!