Background/objective: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the biomechanical differences between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts reconstructed by isometric and anatomic reconstruction techniques, based on their length changes.

Methods: One hundred and thirty-three knees with primary ACL reconstruction using the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) graft were retrospectively identified. Twenty-two knees and 111 knees underwent isometric round tunnel (IRT) ACL reconstruction and anatomic rectangular tunnel (ART) ACL reconstruction, respectively.

Results: After femoral-side fixation of the graft in the surgery, the length change of the graft from 120° flexion to full extension was measured by using an isometric positioner at the tibial side. Both reconstructive techniques showed little length change from 120° to ∼20° of flexion, followed by elongation of the graft, until full extension. The amount of length change of the grafts was 1.0 ± 0.7 mm with the IRT technique, and 3.4 ± 0.9 mm with the ART technique. These findings were significantly different, based on the Mann-Whitney test ( < 0.001).

Conclusion: The native ACL has an intrinsic length change of 3-6 mm, and therefore the ART technique may more closely replicate the biomechanical function of the native ACL.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5730659PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2015.03.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

length change
16
acl reconstruction
12
anterior cruciate
8
cruciate ligament
8
isometric anatomic
8
anatomic reconstruction
8
reconstruction techniques
8
full extension
8
art technique
8
reconstruction
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!