A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Knowledge, Practice and Attitudes Toward Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions Reporting Process Among Health Care Providers in Dammam, Saudi Arabia. | LitMetric

Background: Pharmacovigilance is the science that plays an essential role in the reduction of ADRs which helps in predicting unwanted effects of drugs in community. Studying adverse drug reaction is an important arm of patient care. It aims at making the safe use of medicines for the treatment or prevention of disease.

Objectives: To assess knowledge, Practice and attitudes toward pharmacovigilance and adverse drug reactions reporting process among Health Care Providers in Dammam, KSA.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional and questionnaire-based study involving health care providers working in different hospitals. 160 questionnaires were distributed to the respondents (25 doctors, 65 nurses, 50 pharmacists and 25 other health care provides). Participants were selected randomly and those not willing to participate were excluded from the study. Chi-square test was used for the calculation of P-Value.

Results: 135 participants responded to the questionnaire, while 160 participants were recruited for the study. The majority (n= 99, 73.33%, p=0.007) had no idea about national pharmacovigilance centers of KSA. The standard SFDA adverse drug reaction form was only known to 38.51 %, p=0.028 and only 38.51 %, p=0.002 were aware about electronic reporting of ADR. Only 34 %, p =0.002 of the respondents had ever reported an adverse drug reactions, 76.29 %, p=0.041 have not attended any training on ADR reporting and 86.66%, p=0.045 participants have no idea about impact of ADR reporting.

Conclusion: The knowledge and attitude to ADR reporting was inadequate, our study has shown that the actual practice of ADR reporting is unsatisfactory. This indicates that there is a need to create an awareness of the importance of ADR reporting through CME/training of ADR reporting among healthcare providers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1574886313666171218123802DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

adverse drug
20
adr reporting
20
health care
16
drug reactions
12
care providers
12
knowledge practice
8
practice attitudes
8
attitudes pharmacovigilance
8
pharmacovigilance adverse
8
reporting
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!