Inverted Lobes Have Satisfactory Functions Compared With Noninverted Lobes in Lung Transplantation.

Background: To overcome the problem of small-for-size grafts in standard living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT), we developed inverted LDLLT, in which a right lower lobe from 1 donor is implanted as a right graft and another right lower lobe from another donor is implanted as a left graft. We retrospectively analyzed the functions of inverted grafts vs noninverted grafts.

Methods: Between 2008 and 2015, 64 LDLLTs were performed. Included were 35 LDLLTs whose recipients were adults and monitored for more than 6 months without developing chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Among them, 65 implanted lobes were eligible for this analysis. There were 31 right lower lobes implanted as right grafts (right-to-right group), 7 right lower lobes as inverted left grafts (right-to-left group), and 27 left lower lobes as left grafts (left-to-left group). We evaluated the graft forced vital capacity (G-FVC) and graft volume of the 65 lobes before and 6 months after LDLLT and compared them among the three groups.

Results: Preoperatively, G-FVC in the right-to-left group (1,050 mL) was comparable to that in the right-to-right group (1,177 mL) and better than that in the left-to-left group (791 mL, p < 0.01). Six months after LDLLT, G-FVC in the right-to-left group (1,015 mL) remained comparable to that in the right-to-right group (1,001 mL) and better than that in the left-to-left group (713 mL, p = 0.047). The ratio of graft volume 6 months after LDLLT to the preoperative value was comparable.

Conclusions: The functions of inverted grafts in inverted LDLLTs were satisfactory compared with those of noninverted grafts.