Improved outcomes in elderly trauma patients with the implementation of two innovative geriatric-specific protocols-Final report.

J Trauma Acute Care Surg

From the Trauma Services, Lancaster General Health/Penn Medicine, Lancaster, Pennsylvania (E.H.B., B.W.G., S.J., W.H.A., J.A.M.).

Published: February 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on improving care for elderly trauma patients, particularly addressing their unique health challenges and implementing two key practice management guidelines (PMGs): the high-risk geriatric protocol (HRGP) for injury triage and the anticoagulation and trauma (ACT) alert for patients on blood thinners.
  • Data was collected from over 8,000 geriatric blunt trauma patients between 2000 and 2016, divided into three phases based on the implementation of these PMGs, with the aim of assessing their impact on mortality and complications.
  • Findings revealed that while there was no significant reduction in mortality with the HRGP alone, the combination of HRGP and ACT significantly decreased mortality rates

Article Abstract

Background: Elderly trauma care is challenging owing to the unique physiology and comorbidities prevalent in this population. To improve the care of these patients, two practice management guidelines (PMGs) were implemented: high-risk geriatric protocol (HRGP), which triages patients based on injury patterns and comorbid conditions for occult hypotension, and the anticoagulation and trauma (ACT) alert, which is designed to streamline the care of geriatric trauma patients on anticoagulants. We hypothesized that both HRGP and ACT would decrease mortality and complications in geriatric trauma patients.

Methods: Geriatric blunt trauma patients (aged ≥65) presenting to our Level II center from January 2000 to July 2016 were extracted from the trauma registry. Do-not-resuscitate patients were excluded. The study period was divided into three phases: Phase 1, no PMGs in place (2000 to January 2006); Phase 2, HRGP only (February 2006 to February 2012); and Phase 3, HRGP + ACT (March 2012 to July 2016). Multivariate logistic regression models assessed adjusted mortality and complications during these phases to quantify the impact of these protocols. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: A total of 8,471 geriatric trauma patients met inclusion criteria. Overall mortality rate was 5.6% (Phase 1, 7.2%; Phase 2, 6.1%; Phase 3, 4.0%). No significant change in mortality was observed during Phase 2 with the HRGP only (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.34; p = 0.957); however, a significantly reduced OR of mortality was found during Phase 3 with the combination of both the HRGP and ACT (adjusted OR, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.94; p = 0.021). No significant changes in incidence of complications was observed over the study duration.

Conclusions: Geriatric trauma patients are not simply older adults. Improved outcomes can be realized with specific PMGs tailored to the geriatric trauma patients' needs.

Level Of Evidence: Epidemiologic study, level III.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001752DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

trauma patients
20
geriatric trauma
20
phase hrgp
12
trauma
10
improved outcomes
8
elderly trauma
8
patients
8
mortality complications
8
july 2016
8
phase
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!