Comparison of various methods to analyse toxic effects in human skin explants: Rediscovery of TTC assay.

J Photochem Photobiol B

Department of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Hněvotínská 3, 775 15 Olomouc, Czech Republic. Electronic address:

Published: January 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • Skin explants are proposed as a viable alternative to animal and human testing for dermatological research, focusing on assessing the effects of UVA radiation and chemical agents.
  • The study compared various viability assays—MTT, neutral red, LDH, and the less common TTC—to determine which was most effective at evaluating toxicity in skin explants, particularly after exposure to model agents.
  • Results indicated that the TTC assay was the most reliable in detecting dose-dependent toxicity, while MTT and neutral red assays failed, and LDH provided only partial results; haematoxylin-eosin staining showed structural changes but was not useful for immediate toxic assessments.

Article Abstract

Skin explants are a suitable model which can replace dermatological experiments on animals or human volunteers. In this study, we searched for a fast, cheap and reproducible method for screening skin explant viability after treatment with UVA radiation or/and chemical agents. We compared frequently used methods: 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), neutral red (NR) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity assay with a rarely used 2,3,5-triphenyl-2H-tetrazolium chloride (TTC) assay for the evaluation of UVA radiation and/or chlorpromazine and 8-methoxypsoralen effect as model agents. Histological analysis of skin explants was also performed by a simple haematoxylin-eosin method. Only the TTC assay was able to show the toxicity of model agents in a dose- and concentration-dependent manner. LDH assay was partially able to demonstrate results comparable to the TTC method, however, the agents' effect was less pronounced. The MTT and NR assays completely failed in the evaluation. Haematoxylin-eosin staining showed discrete structural changes in samples treated with UVA alone and CPZ+UVA, but only after 48h. Therefore, the method is not useful for screening of toxic or phototoxic effects either. In conclusion, the TTC assay was the most suitable for the evaluation of toxicity or phototoxicity in ex vivo skin.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.12.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ttc assay
16
skin explants
12
method screening
8
uva radiation
8
model agents
8
assay
6
skin
5
ttc
5
comparison methods
4
methods analyse
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!