Delivery of Global Cancer Care: An International Study of Medical Oncology Workload.

J Glob Oncol

Adam Fundytus, Michael D. Brundage, and Christopher M. Booth, Queen's University Cancer Research Institute; Nazik Hammad, Wilma M. Hopman, Michael D. Brundage, and Christopher M. Booth, Queen's University; Wilma M. Hopman, Kingston General Hospital Research Institute, Kingston, Canada; Richard Sullivan, King's College London, King's Health Partners Comprehensive Cancer Centre, London, United Kingdom; Verna Vanderpuye, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana; Bostjan Seruga, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Gilberto Lopes, University of Miami and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL; and Manju Sengar, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.

Published: September 2018

Background: To our knowledge, there is no literature that has described medical oncology (MO) workload in the global context. Here, we report results of an international study of global MO workload.

Methods: An online survey was distributed through a snowball method via national oncology societies to chemotherapy-prescribing physicians in 65 countries. Countries were classified into low- or low-middle-income countries (LMICs), upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), and high-income countries (HICs) on the basis of World Bank criteria. Workload was measured as the annual number of new consultations provided to patients with cancer per oncologist.

Results: A total of 1,115 physicians completed the survey: 13% (147 of 1,115) from LMICs, 17% (186 of 1,115) from UMICs, and 70% (782 of 1,115) from HICs. Eighty percent (897 of 1,115) of respondents were medical oncologists, 10% (109 of 1,115) were clinical oncologists, and 10% (109 of 1,115) were other. The median number of annual consults per oncologist was 175 (interquartile range, 75 to 275); 13% (140 of 1,103) saw ≥ 500 new patients in a year. Annual case volume in LMICs (median consults, 425; 40% of respondents seeing > 500 consults) was substantially higher than in UMICs (median consults, 175; 14% > 500) and HICs (median consults, 175; 7% > 500; P < .001). Among LMICs, UMICs, and HICs, median working days per week were 6, 5, and 5, respectively ( P < .001). The highest annual case volumes per oncologist were in Pakistan (median consults, 950; 73% > 500 consults), India (median consults, 475; 43% > 500), and Turkey (median consults, 475; 27% > 500).

Conclusion: There is substantial global variation in medical oncology case volumes and clinical workload; this is most striking among LMICs, where huge deficits exist. Additional work is needed, particularly detailed country-level mapping, to quantify activity-based global MO practice and workload to inform training needs and the design of new pathways and models of care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6180784PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JGO.17.00126DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

median consults
24
medical oncology
12
consults
9
international study
8
oncology workload
8
oncologists 10%
8
10% 109
8
109 1115
8
median
8
annual case
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!