Objective: To explore the needs of cancer patients in palliative care and to determine how care providers, including family physicians, could meet these needs more fully.
Design: Qualitative study performed using semistructured interviews.
Setting: Palliative care departments (ambulatory and intrahospital).
Participants: Twelve patients with a diagnosis of cancer deemed to be in the palliative phase, who had already received either chemotherapy or radiation treatment.
Methods: The interviews were recorded and transcribed. They were then coded and categorized to identify and define themes describing the participants' experience. Data were collected until new interviews no longer yielded new categories of results.
Main Findings: Study participants primarily needed the expertise of their physicians, but they also needed reassurance by means of clear information about their disease, its treatment, and the prognosis delivered over the course of patient-physician visits, and by means of various measures that could act as safety nets. Participants needed to be heard without being judged. In terms of follow-up care, the oncology nurse navigator was just as important as the physician and could stand in for him or her to meet most relational needs and share and explain information on the disease.
Conclusion: Non-family physician specialists cannot meet all of the patients' complex needs; throughout the palliative phase, non-family physician specialists need the support of a family physician and an oncology nurse navigator. Each care provider must be made aware of the patient's needs and ensure that they are met, to the best of his or her ability. Failing to do so might exacerbate the loneliness and anxiety experienced by terminally ill patients.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5729158 | PMC |
Curr Oncol Rep
January 2025
Medical College of Georgia of the University System of Georgia, 2 Oceans West Blvd, Daytona Beach Shores, FL, 32118, USA.
Background: Disease-focus management of late-stage cancer without addressing patients' preferences or quality of life (QoL) can lead to unsatisfactory patient and disease outcomes.
Methods: A PRISMA-adherent systematic review of the literature was conducted via PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar to assess the current late-stage cancer treatment modality, setting, timing, and cost, their impact on patient and disease outcomes, and possible interventions for improvement.
Results: Out of many studies, twelve from North America, Western Europe, and Asia met our inclusion criteria.
Patient Educ Couns
January 2025
Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany; Department of Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Aim: To explore healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences when communicating about child- and family-related aspects in cancer care and their attitudes about the importance of including these aspects in cancer care.
Methods: We conduced semi-structured interviews with HCPs working in oncology. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Kuckartz's method for qualitative content analysis.
Mult Scler Relat Disord
January 2025
Department of Clinical Neurological Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Context: Persons with advanced multiple sclerosis (MS) require care beyond the disease modifying treatments offered in conventional MS clinics to address their complex physical and psychosocial needs. In the novel MS Comprehensive and Palliative Care (MSCPC) Program, an MS neurologist, palliative care specialist, and physiatrist collaborate to identify these needs and improve symptom control.
Objectives: To characterize the medical, physical, and psychosocial concerns of persons with advanced disability from MS and describe the recommended interventions of the MSCPC Program.
Appl Nurs Res
February 2025
Institute of Community Health Care, College of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, UK. Electronic address:
Aim: Compare the convergent and divergent viewpoints of early-stage postoperative patients with glioblastoma and their caregivers on end-of-life care planning in Taiwan.
Background: Decision-making capacity in patients with glioblastoma may be compromised as disease progresses, making early future care planning essential to ensure that the provided care aligns with patients' goals. However, within many Asian cultures, the tendency to avoid discussions about death can lead patients to feel hesitant about addressing end-of-life care options.
J Biomed Inform
January 2025
Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 17 5009 Bergen, Norway; Neuro-SysMed, Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas vei 65 5021 Bergen, Norway.
Background: Increased prevalence of neurodegenerative diseases complicates care needs for older adults. Sensing technologies, such as smartwatches, are one available solution which can help address the challenges of aging. Knowledge of the possibilities and pitfalls of these sensing technologies is of key importance to researchers when choosing a device for a trial and considering the sustainability of these technologies in real-world settings.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!