A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prediction of the histopathologic findings of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: qualitative and quantitative assessment of diffusion-weighted imaging. | LitMetric

Objective: To correlate qualitative and quantitative diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) characteristics of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with histopathologic tumour grade and fibrosis content.

Methods: Fifty-one patients (21M/30F; mean age 61y) with ICC and MRI including DWI were included in this IRB-approved multicentre retrospective study. Qualitative tumour features were assessed. Tumour apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) mean, minimum, and normalized (nADC) values were computed. Tumour grade [well(G1), moderately(G2), or poorly differentiated(G3)] and tumour fibrosis content [minimal(1), moderate(2), or abundant(3)] were categorized pathologically. Imaging findings and ADC values were compared with pathologic measures. Utility of ADC values for predicting tumour grade was assessed using ROC analysis.

Results: 51 ICCs (mean size 6.5±1.1 cm) were assessed. 33/51(64%) of ICCs demonstrated diffuse hyperintensity and 15/51(29%) demonstrated target appearance on DWI. Infiltrative morphology (p=0.02) and tumour size (p=0.04) were associated with G3. ADCmean and nADCmean of G3 (1.32±0.47x10 mm/sec and 0.97±0.95) were lower than G1+G2 (1.57±0.39x10 mm/sec and 1.24±0.49; p=0.03 and p=0.04). ADCmean and nADCmean were inversely correlated with tumour grade (p<0.025). No correlation was found between ADC and tumour fibrosis content. AUROC, sensitivity and specificity of nADCmean for G3 versus G1+G2 were 0.71, 89.5% and 55.5%.

Conclusion: ADC quantification has reasonable accuracy for predicting ICC grade.

Key Points: • ADC quantification was useful for predicting ICC tumour grade. • Infiltrative tumour morphology and size were associated with poorly differentiated ICCs. • ADC values depended more on ICC tumour grade than fibrosis content. • Ability to predict ICC tumour grade non-invasively could impact patient management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5156-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tumour grade
16
intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
8
qualitative quantitative
8
tumour
8
adc values
8
adcmean nadcmean
8
prediction histopathologic
4
histopathologic findings
4
findings intrahepatic
4
cholangiocarcinoma qualitative
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!