Objective: Transurethral bladder catheterization (TUBC) is a painful, frequently performed procedure for collecting sterile urine. We sought to determine if administration of intraurethral lidocaine before TUBC using a blunt tipped syringe decreases procedural pain in young children in the pediatric emergency department.
Methods: Randomized clinical trial of children 0 to 36 months old requiring TUBC for collection of urine in a pediatric emergency department was performed. Patients received intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly or usual care (no analgesia). Randomization was stratified by sex. Intraurethral lidocaine jelly was administered via Uro-Jet, 5 minutes before TUBC. Baseline child state, lidocaine application, TUBC, and child state 1 minute post-TUBC were videotaped. Neither providers nor parents were blinded to study arm. Videos were scored by a trained, independent, blinded reviewer using the Faces, Legs, Arms, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) and Modified Behavioral Pain Score scales. Pain scores were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Our primary outcome was difference in FLACC scores between groups.
Results: Eighty children were enrolled in the study, and 73 had analyzable data. No differences were detected in pain by mean FLACC score between intervention (8; 95% confidence interval, 7-9) and control (9; 95% confidence interval, 8-10) groups. There were no differences between groups in mean FLACC score when stratified by age or sex or in mean Modified Behavioral Pain Score.
Conclusions: Intraurethral lidocaine for TUBC for urine collection using a blunt tipped applicator did not improve procedural pain scores. Pain scores were high across groups. Further study should be performed to improve analgesia for this highly painful procedure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001358 | DOI Listing |
Int Urol Nephrol
July 2023
Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, 613 W. Huangpu Avenue No. 4 Bldg, 6th floor, Guangzhou, China.
Purpose: To assess the safety and effectiveness of the 4.5/6.5 Fr ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy (URSL) under topical intraurethral anesthesia (TIUA) compared to spinal anesthesia (SA).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFKathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)
August 2024
Department of Anesthesiology, Sindhuli, Nepal.
Background Male rigid cystoscopy is one of the most common outpatient procedures in urology because of it lower cost, better optical area and better orientation compared with flexible devices. However, performing rigid cystoscopy is not only painful but equally apprehensive in awake male patients. Objective The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine gel and ketamine solution together compared with lidocaine gel alone during male rigid cystoscopy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUrology
December 2022
Süleyman Demirel University, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, Isparta, Isparta, Turkey.
Objective: To assess feasibility and efficacy of local topical urethral anesthesia at optical internal urethrotomy (OIU) in patients with anterior and posterior urethral strictures at outpatient clinic.
Methods: One hundred and twenty eight patients were prospectively randomized to perform OIU with intraurethral prilocaine solution (group 1 = 64 patients) or intraurethral lidocaine gel (group 2 = 64 patients). Visual analog scale was used for procedure related pain evaluation at the beginning, during, and one hour after the procedure.
Turk J Urol
September 2021
Department of Urology, Universitas Airlangga Faculty of Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General- Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.
Pain and discomfort may occur in catheterization during a urodynamic examination. A lidocaine gel combined with a water-based lubricant is sometimes used to reduce pain during catheterization. Several studies claimed that intraurethral lidocaine administration could cause inaccurate urodynamic parameters results.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUrol Oncol
January 2022
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC. Electronic address:
Objective: To evaluate the degree of discomfort among patients with bladder cancer undergoing office-based cystoscopy and identify factors and interventions that influence discomfort and anxiety.
Methods: We conducted a survey of the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Patient Survey Network (BCAN PSN) to investigate the degree of discomfort associated with office-based cystoscopy and prevalence of interventions used to reduce discomfort. All patients had undergone at least one previous cystoscopy.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!