Objective: To assess the relationship between copay amount and vaccination claim submission status for tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) and herpes zoster (GSK study identifier: HO-14-14319).
Methods: Retrospective analyses were performed using vaccination administrative claims data in patients aged ≥65 years with ≥1 claim for Tdap or zoster vaccines between 2012 and 2014. To avoid confounding by other financial responsibility, analyses were conducted among patients in the copayment phase of insurance. The impact of patient copay amount on vaccination claim status ("canceled" vs. "paid") was evaluated by logistic regression separately for Tdap and zoster, adjusting for patient and provider characteristics.
Results: A total of 81,027 (39.2% with canceled claims) and 346,417 patients (56.8% with canceled claims) were included in the Tdap and zoster analyses, respectively. Mean (standard deviation) copay for canceled vs. paid claims was $37.2 (18.4) vs. $31.1 (20.1) for Tdap and $64.9 (36.9) vs. $53.5 (38.8) for zoster. The adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for a canceled Tdap vaccine claim, compared with $0 copay, were 1.19 ($1-25 copay), 1.76 ($26-50 copay), 2.42 ($51-75 copay) and 2.40 ($76-100 copay), all p < .001. The adjusted ORs for a canceled zoster vaccine claim, compared with $0 copay, were 1.02 ($1-25), 1.39 ($26-50), 1.66 ($51-75), 2.07 ($76-100) and 2.71 (>$100), all p < .001 except for $1-25 (p = .172).
Conclusions: High patient copay is a barrier to Tdap and zoster vaccinations in Medicare Part D patients. Providing vaccines at low or no copay may improve vaccination rates in these adults. GSK study identifier: HO-14-14319.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2017.1416347 | DOI Listing |
Vaccine
December 2024
TCD Biostatistics Unit, Discipline of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. Electronic address:
The safety and efficacy of vaccination is a subject contentious in the public mind. Despite overwhelming evidence of their benefits to public health, COVID-19 and human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines have been the focus of intense concerns. While the original phase III trials and post-market phase IV studies have continued to show their benefits and positive safety profile, some authors have attempted to reassess the original trial data, purporting to showing hidden harms for both COVID-19 and HPV vaccines.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMJ Open
December 2024
Francis I Proctor Foundation for Research in Ophthalmology, San Francisco, California, USA
Importance: Immunocompromised status is a risk factor for severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Little is known about how systemic corticosteroid dose and concurrent use of immunosuppressants are associated with COVID-19 outcomes.
Objective: To assess the association between corticosteroid dose/duration and concurrent immunosuppressant use on COVID-19 hospitalisation and death in the era of COVID-19 vaccinations.
Infect Dis Ther
December 2024
Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Nonnenwald 2, 81377, Penzberg, Germany.
Introduction: The use of antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2, as a method of estimating subsequent infection following infection or vaccination, is unclear. Here, we investigate whether specific levels of antibodies, as markers of adaptive immunity, can serve to estimate the risk of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 (re-) infection.
Methods: In this real-world study, laboratory data from individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies under routine clinical conditions were linked through tokenization to a United States medical insurance claims database to determine the risk of symptomatic/severe SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes.
Pulm Ther
December 2024
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Introduction: This real-world study assessed the effectiveness of bebtelovimab (BEB) versus nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NR) among outpatients with COVID-19 during the Omicron variant era.
Methods: We conducted a cohort study evaluating patients treated with BEB or NR from February to August 2022 (study period). Follow-up began the day after treatment and continued for 30 days.
Cancer Control
December 2024
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Background: Despite Zambia implementing the World Health Organisation's (WHO) tri-pillar cervical cancer prevention goals 90-70-90 Prevent, Screen, and Treat, cervical cancer claims 2000 lives annually and reigns as the most common cancer among women, especially those living with HIV (WLHIV). Our study describes the national uptake of screening and treatment from the ZAMPHIA 2021 survey.
Methods: Utilising a two-stage cluster sampling approach, the study included participants aged 15 years and older across Zambia's ten provinces.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!