Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We used a plastic model of the human eye to study the accuracy with which the Optic Nerve Head Analyzer estimates the surface contour and two-dimensional size of the optic nerve head. Computer-generated contour lines were similar to the actual cross-sectional contour of plastic cups as photographed by scanning electron microscopy. The magnification error of computer-measured cup diameters was inversely related to the axial length of the model. The slope of this relationship was reduced with the use of either refraction or axial length as a correction factor for magnification error. Of the two correction factors, the former provided the closest estimation of the known diameters in the phakic model, while the latter performed better in the aphakic model.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(89)90312-7 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!