Background: The impact of a new class of automated digital patient engagement (DPE) platforms on potentially avoidable costs, hospital admissions, and complications after discharge following hip and knee arthroplasties has not been established.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter observational cohort study comparing claims data for potentially avoidable costs, hospital admissions, and complications for 90 days after discharge following hip and knee arthroplasties at 10 practice sites in CA and NV. One hundred eighty-six patients, enrolled between 2014 and 2016 on an automated DPE platform receiving guidance and remote monitoring perioperatively, were compared with 372 patients who underwent the same procedures from the same physicians within 3 years immediately preceding platform implementation. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with $0.00 in 90-day target costs because of potentially avoidable utilization within the platform's influence. Secondary end points included rates of potentially avoidable 90-day hospital admissions and composite complications.
Results: Ninety-three percent and 84.7% of the study and baseline cohorts, respectively, had $0.00 in target costs (P = .004), with a mean savings of $656.52/patient (P = .006). The baseline and study cohorts had 3.0% and 1.6% 90-day hospital admission rates (relative risk 0.545; 0.154, 1.931, P = .40), and 15.3% and 7.0% composite complication rates, respectively (relative risk 0.456; 0.256, 0.812, P = .004).
Conclusion: Patients enrolled on an automated DPE platform after hip and knee arthroplasties demonstrated a significant reduction in potentially avoidable 90-day costs, a 45.4% nonsignificant relative reduction in 90-day hospital admissions, and a 54.4% significant relative reduction in 90-day complications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.036 | DOI Listing |
Qual Life Res
January 2025
School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue (FHS), Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Purpose: Involving patients in developing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is essential for accurately capturing their perspectives. However, understanding how patients were involved in developing PROMs used after hip or knee arthroplasty is limited. This scoping review aimed to evaluate whether patients were involved in the development of these PROMs and how they were involved.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCogn Process
January 2025
Human Movement Science Group, University of Bremen, Am Fallturm 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
The objective was to examine differences in the gait-specific cognitive representation structures between individuals after total knee- (TKA) and after total hip-joint arthroplasty (THA). The cognitive representation structure was compared between three groups: 1. three months after TKA (n = 12), 2.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)
January 2025
Sports Medicine Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Objective: Revision surgeries for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) in arthroplasty can follow either one- or two-stage treatment protocols. Previous studies have reported similar reinfection rates and reductions in complication rates for both treatment options. However, the literature on the selection of one protocol is still controversial.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCochrane Database Syst Rev
January 2025
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep, and Occupational Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Background: People undergoing major orthopaedic surgery are at increased risk of postoperative thromboembolic events. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) are recommended for thromboprophylaxis in this population. New oral anticoagulants, including direct factor Xa inhibitors, are recommended as alternatives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Orthop
July 2025
University of Louisville, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, United States.
Background: Traditionally, total joint arthroplasty has been performed as an inpatient procedure, sometimes requiring a hospital stay of a few days. However, outpatient total joints have gained popularity in recent years. The purpose of this study is to compare patient outcomes following an outpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or a total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a hospital setting versus an ambulatory surgical center.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!