Mandate Repeal Provision Ends Health Care Calm.

Health Aff (Millwood)

Timothy Stoltzfus Jost ( ) is an emeritus professor at the Washington and Lee University School of Law and a contributing editor at Health Affairs. [Published online December 11, 2017.] Readers can find more detail and updates on health reform on Health Affairs Blog ( http://healthaffairs.org/blog/ ).

Published: January 2018

Marketplace enrollment for 2018 has been robust in the face of several obstacles, but the ACA faces a new threat after the Senate's vote to repeal the individual mandate.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1551DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mandate repeal
4
repeal provision
4
provision ends
4
ends health
4
health care
4
care calm
4
calm marketplace
4
marketplace enrollment
4
enrollment 2018
4
2018 robust
4

Similar Publications

The Affordable Care Act ("ACA") contains a section titled "Requirement to Maintain Essential Minimum Coverage." Colloquially known as the Individual Mandate, this section of the Act initially established a monetary penalty for anyone who did not maintain health insurance in a given tax year. But with the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the monetary penalty was reset to zero, inducing opponents of the ACA to mount a legal challenge over the Individual Mandate's constitutionality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in the US, counties adopted numerous nonpharmaceutical interventions, such as mask mandates and stay-at-home orders, to slow COVID-19 transmission and prevent hospitals from reaching full capacity. Early evidence has been mixed about whether these interventions are effective. However, most studies only covered the early waves of COVID-19 and did not account for county-level variation in the adoption and repeal of such policies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA), current federal policy mandates a lifetime ban for individuals with a past felony drug conviction from receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefits. Denying nutritional and financial assistance to individuals with a past felony conviction will widen existing structural health inequities, set back individuals' successful re-entry into society, and contribute to recidivism and poorer health outcomes. Therefore, the Society of Behavioral Medicine supports the RESTORE ACT (Re-Entry Support Through Opportunities for Resources and Essentials Act), which would repeal the lifetime ban on receiving SNAP and TANF benefits for individuals convicted of a drug felony.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In June 2019, New York State (NYS) adopted Senate Bill 2994A eliminating nonmedical vaccine exemptions from school entry laws. Since student noncompliance with the law required school exclusion, we sought to evaluate the law's effects on student enrollment and absenteeism, and school workloads related to its implementation. In November 2019, we sent an electronic survey to NYS (excluding New York City) schools.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!