A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Stitching test of large flats by using two orthogonally arranged wavefront interferometers. | LitMetric

The most challenging problem in the stitching test of large flats with a small-aperture interferometer is the accumulation effect of the second-order error. As it is approximately enlarged by the square of the ratio of full aperture size to subaperture size, a very small amount of the second-order error in the reference surface of a transmission flat can be accumulated and gets far from negligible when the subaperture is far smaller than the full aperture. We present here a solution by using two orthogonally arranged wavefront interferometers. One is responsible for a subaperture test and the other for the simultaneous measurement of relative tilts. Because the accumulation effect originates from the lateral shift of the second-order error, only the tilt along the subaperture scanning direction needs to be measured accurately. It is no longer determined by stitching optimization instead to avoid the error accumulation. Piston and tilt perpendicular to the scanning direction are still determined by stitching optimization. The method is experimentally verified and compared to the stitching test with the reference surface error calibrated out, both referenced to the full aperture test result obtained with a 24-inch interferometer.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.009193DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stitching test
12
second-order error
12
full aperture
12
test large
8
large flats
8
orthogonally arranged
8
arranged wavefront
8
wavefront interferometers
8
reference surface
8
scanning direction
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!