AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to classify patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on their immune cell patterns before treatment and to identify groups that might respond well to abatacept therapy.
  • The analysis used gene expression data from a clinical trial and identified four patient clusters characterized by different immune cells, with one cluster (C3) displaying the most severe disease indicators and the greatest likelihood of benefiting from abatacept.
  • The findings suggest that understanding immune cell types can help tailor SLE clinical trials and treatment strategies.

Article Abstract

Objective: To characterise patients with active SLE based on pretreatment gene expression-defined peripheral immune cell patterns and identify clusters enriched for potential responders to abatacept treatment.

Methods: This post hoc analysis used baseline peripheral whole blood transcriptomic data from patients in a phase IIb trial of intravenous abatacept (~10 mg/kg/month). Cell-specific genes were used with a published deconvolution algorithm to identify immune cell proportions in patient samples, and unsupervised consensus clustering was generated. Efficacy data were re-analysed.

Results: Patient data (n=144: abatacept: n=98; placebo: n=46) were grouped into four main clusters (C) by predominant characteristic cells: C1-neutrophils; C2-cytotoxic T cells, B-cell receptor-ligated B cells, monocytes, IgG memory B cells, activated T helper cells; C3-plasma cells, activated dendritic cells, activated natural killer cells, neutrophils; C4-activated dendritic cells, cytotoxic T cells. C3 had the highest baseline total British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) scores, highest antidouble-stranded DNA autoantibody levels and shortest time to flare (TTF), plus trends in favour of response to abatacept over placebo: adjusted mean difference in BILAG score over 1 year, -4.78 (95% CI -12.49 to 2.92); median TTF, 56 vs 6 days; greater normalisation of complement component 3 and 4 levels. Differential improvements with abatacept were not seen in other clusters, except for median TTF in C1 (201 vs 109 days).

Conclusions: Immune cell clustering segmented disease severity and responsiveness to abatacept. Definition of immune response cell types may inform design and interpretation of SLE trials and treatment decisions.

Trial Registration Number: NCT00119678; results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5704740PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2017-000206DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

immune cell
12
cells activated
12
cells
10
response abatacept
8
blood transcriptomic
8
transcriptomic data
8
phase iib
8
dendritic cells
8
median ttf
8
abatacept
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!