A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint-A biomechanical comparison of four fixation techniques. | LitMetric

Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint-A biomechanical comparison of four fixation techniques.

Foot Ankle Surg

Clinique des Cedres, 38130 Echirolles, France. Electronic address:

Published: December 2017

Background: Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint is a commonly performed orthopaedic procedure. The optimum method of fixation and joint surface preparation has yet to be determined.

Methods: This study compared four fixation techniques: Biomechanical grade sawbones were used. The dorsal plate used was a titanium, anatomically contoured locked plate. Testing was performed using an Instron machine applying force from the plantar aspect of the fused joint. Each fused sample was tested to failure. Stiffness, as calculated from the force-displacement curve, and ultimate load tolerated were recorded for each sample. The method of failure of each sample was also documented.

Results: Constructs arthrodesed using dorsal plate with separate screw groups, regardless of method of joint preparation, were the stiffest (p<0.001). The weakest construct was dorsal plate alone without interfragmenary screw. There was no difference in stiffness between planar and cup-cone joint preparation (p=0.99). Maximum load tolerated was similar when comparing Crossed Screws with dorsal plate with screw with either cup-cone or planar reaming (p=0.93, p=0.89 respectively). Dorsal plating alone tolerated a significantly lower maximum load than Plate with Screw Groups or Crossed Screws (p<0.001).

Conclusion: This study confirms that an IFS combined with a dorsally positioned locked-plate is the ideal construct, with the joint preparation technique of little consequence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2016.07.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

arthrodesis metatarsophalangeal
8
fixation techniques
8
dorsal plate
8
metatarsophalangeal joint-a
4
joint-a biomechanical
4
biomechanical comparison
4
comparison fixation
4
techniques background
4
background arthrodesis
4
joint
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!