Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Study Design: Retrospective radiographic study.
Objective: To assess whether flexibility as revealed by the supine radiograph, predicts in-brace curve correction.
Summary Of Background Data: Currently there is no consensus regarding a standard method to assess curve flexibility and immediate brace effectiveness in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Brace fabrication methods may be variable but ideally it should achieve maximal curve correction. Curve flexibility governs the degree of curve correction in-brace and hence dynamic radiographs are commonly performed prior to brace fitting.
Methods: This was a radiographic analysis of AIS patients treated with underarm bracing. Correlation of pre-brace, supine, and immediate in-brace Cobb angles was performed. Relationship with possible contributing factors including age, sex, body height, weight, age at menarche and Risser staging was studied. Major and minor curves were compared independently for correlation but the regression model was constructed based on the major curve only.
Results: From 105 patients with mean age of 12.2 ± 1.2 years at brace fitting, supine Cobb angle measurement has significant correlation with immediate in-brace Cobb angle (r = 0.740). Univariate analyses showed no significant relationship with age, weight, height, date of menarche, Risser stage or pre-brace Cobb angle. Our regression model (in-brace Cobb angle = 0.809 × supine Cobb angle) had good fit of the data.
Conclusion: Supine radiograph predictably determines the flexibility of the scoliotic curve to brace treatment. It can be used as a guideline to determine the amount of correction achievable with brace-wear. The effectiveness of the brace is dependent on the inherent flexibility of the curve rather than its size or type.
Level Of Evidence: 3.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002503 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!