Study Design: Multicenter, retrospective, institutional-review-board -approved study at 18 institutions in the United States with 24 treating investigators.

Objective: This study was designed to retrospectively assess the prevalence of spinopelvic malalignment in patients who underwent one- or two-level lumbar fusions for degenerative (nondeformity) indications and to assess the incidence of malalignment after fusion surgery as well as the rate of alignment preservation and/or correction in this population.

Summary Of Background Data: Spinopelvic malalignment after lumbar fusion has been associated with lower postoperative health-related quality of life and elevated risk of adjacent segment failure. The prevalence of spinopelvic malalignment in short-segment degenerative lumbar fusion procedures from a large sample of patients is heretofore unreported and may lead to an under-appreciation of these factors in surgical planning and ultimate preservation or correction of alignment.

Methods: Lateral preoperative and postoperative lumbar radiographs were retrospectively acquired from 578 one- or two-level lumbar fusion patients and newly measured for lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt. Patients were categorized at preop and postop time points as aligned if PI-LL < 10° or malaligned if PI-LL≥10°. Patients were grouped into categories based on their alignment progression from pre- to postoperative, with preserved (aligned to aligned), restored (malaligned to aligned), not corrected (malaligned to malaligned), and worsened (aligned to malaligned) designations.

Results: Preoperatively, 173 (30%) patients exhibited malalignment. Postoperatively, 161 (28%) of patients were malaligned. Alignment was preserved in 63%, restored in 9%, not corrected in 21%, and worsened in 7% of patients.

Conclusion: This is the first multicenter study to evaluate the preoperative prevalence and postoperative incidence of spinopelvic malalignment in a large series of short-segment degenerative lumbar fusions, finding over 25% of patients out of alignment at both time points, suggesting that alignment preservation/restoration considerations should be incorporated into the decision-making of even degenerative lumbar spinal fusions.

Level Of Evidence: 3.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002500DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spinopelvic malalignment
12
lumbar fusion
12
preoperative postoperative
8
prevalence spinopelvic
8
one- two-level
8
two-level lumbar
8
lumbar
6
malalignment
5
multicenter radiographic
4
radiographic evaluation
4

Similar Publications

Background Context: Lumbar decompression and short-segment lumbar fusion are standard procedures for short-segment lumbar canal stenosis, even in patients with moderate Cobb angles. Adult degenerative scoliosis is diagnosed at a threshold of 10 degrees, and patients with coronal Cobb angles over 30 degrees are recommended for long fusion due to global spinal deformity. However, there is a lack of research on clinical outcomes in patients with moderate coronal deformity, such as Cobb angles between 20 and 30 degrees.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of the hip osteoarthritis on sagittal spine-pelvis alignment parameters in lumbar spinal stenosis with sagittal malalignment: a propensity score matching study.

Eur Spine J

December 2024

Department of Orthopedics and Elderly Spinal Surgery, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, No.45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100053, China.

Purpose: There is a paucity of data regarding the sagittal spine-pelvis-leg alignment and the compensatory mechanisms in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and hip osteoarthritis (HOA). In this study, we aim to evaluate the association of HOA with sagittal spine-pelvis alignment parameters in a population of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and sagittal malalignment.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of prospectively enrolled patients with degenerative LSS and sagittal malalignment between January 2019 and December 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Course and Predictors of Adult Spinal Sagittal Disorders: A 10-year Prospective Case Series.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

October 2024

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hospital Nova, Wellbeing services county of Central Finland.

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to track the progression of adult spinal deformity (ASD) over a decade, focusing on factors that affect spinal alignment.
  • It involved analyzing full spine radiographs of 204 participants, showing a significant overall deterioration in spinal condition, with only 13% of participants experiencing improvement.
  • Key predictors for changes in spinal alignment included low scores on self-assessment questionnaires related to function and severe pelvic tilt, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment approaches based on individual risk factors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Understanding the mechanism and extent of preoperative deformity in revision procedures may provide data to prevent future failures in lumbar spinal fusion patients.

Methods: ASD patients without prior spine surgery (PRIMARY) and with prior short (SHORT) and long (LONG) fusions were included. SHORT patients were stratified into modes of failure: implant, junctional, malalignment, and neurologic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study investigates mechanical complications (MCs) in patients with Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) who are considered well-aligned post-surgery, revealing that alignment alone does not eliminate the risk of these complications.
  • - A total of 83 patients aged 55 and older were analyzed, with 40% experiencing at least one MC during an average of 4 years of follow-up, including issues like proximal junctional kyphosis and nonunion of surgical rods.
  • - The research utilized a multicenter database to identify and analyze risk factors contributing to MCs through statistical methods like binary logistic regression and ROC curve analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!