Assessment of test method variables for in vitro skin irritation testing of medical device extracts.

Toxicol In Vitro

Nelson Laboratories, LLC, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Electronic address:

Published: August 2018

Skin irritation is an important component of the biological safety evaluation of medical devices. This testing has typically been performed using in vivo models. However, in an effort to reduce the need for in vivo testing, alternative methods for assessing skin irritation potential in vitro have been developed using a Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RhE) model. During the development of the protocol for the round robin validation of in vitro irritation testing for medical device extracts, it became clear that there were three points in the procedure where different options may be validated within each laboratory for routine testing: sample exposure time (18 vs 24h), SDS positive control concentration, and cytokine (IL-1α) release testing. The goal of our study was to evaluate the effect of these variables. EpiDerm™ tissues were exposed to extracts of three plain polymer samples, and four polymers embedded with known irritant chemicals. Exposures were performed for 18 and 24h. Resulting tissue viability was assessed by MTT reduction and IL-1α release was assessed by ELISA. Testing was also performed using various concentrations of SDS ranging from 0.5 to 1% (w/v). Overall, results were similar for samples tested and 18 and 24h, but the 18h exposure time has the potential to have an impact on the results of some sample types. IL-1α testing was shown to be useful to clarify conflicting tissue viability results. Use of a lower concentration of SDS as a positive control can help prevent issues that arise from excessive tissue damage often caused by 1% SDS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2017.11.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skin irritation
12
testing
8
irritation testing
8
testing medical
8
medical device
8
device extracts
8
exposure time
8
sds positive
8
positive control
8
il-1α release
8

Similar Publications

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of an essential oil from the aerial parts of  ×  L. (peppermint oil) when used as a sensory additive in feed and in water for drinking for all animal species. The EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) concluded that that peppermint oil is safe for all animal species at the maximum use level of 12 mg/kg complete feed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Following a request from the European Commission, the European Food Safety Authority was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the proposed modification of the terms of the authorisation of canthaxanthin, regarding the addition of a new production route, by the yeast CBS 146148. The additive is already authorised as sensory feed additive for use in feed for chickens for fattening, minor poultry species for fattening, laying poultry, poultry reared for laying, ornamental fish, ornamental birds and ornamental breeder hens. The Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) concludes that canthaxanthin produced with CBS 146148 is considered safe for the target species, the consumer and the environment under the current authorised conditions of use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the proposed modification of the terms of the authorisation of the feed additive consisting of a preparation of canthaxanthin (CAROPHYLL® Red 10%), regarding the addition of a new production route, by the yeast CBS 146148 and to modify the additive specifications by substituting ethoxyquin by 4.4% butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and increasing the limit for dichloromethane to 80 mg/kg. The additive is already authorised as zootechnical feed additive for breeder hens.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of the feed additive consisting of endo-1,3(4)-beta-glucanase and endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (produced with IMI CC 378536) (Rovabio® Excel) for the renewal of its authorisation as a zootechnical feed additive for all poultry species, weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and sows. The applicant provided evidence that the additive complies with the conditions of the authorisation. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive in all its formulations remains safe for all poultry species, weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and sows, and remains safe for consumers and the environment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to develop patches containing quercetin-loaded microcapsules and to evaluate their in vitro and in vivo safety and efficacy in preclinical surveys. A set of in vitro experiments evidenced the virucidal activity of quercetin against the HSV-1-KOS (sensitive to acyclovir) and HSV-1-AR (resistant to acyclovir) strains, with improved outcomes upon the first. The patches presented a homogeneous aspect, were easily handled, had a suitable bioadhesion, and possessed mechanical properties of soft and weak material, besides a pH compatible with human skin.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!