The aim was to compare the effects of two evisceration methods under operational conditions, on the pelvic hygiene of sheep carcasses. Method 1: rectum sealed with plastic bag and pushed through the pelvic cavity. Method 2: rectum cut, placed back inside and pulled out from the carcass. The 18 largest Norwegian sheep abattoirs participated. Sampling areas were i) 400cm inside the pelvic cavity (n=623), ii) 100cm outside the circum-anal incision (n=622). There were pooled samples by swabbing the same area of five carcasses, representing totally 3115 carcasses. Mean E. coli results from Method 1: -1.61logCFU/cm inside and -0.25logCFU/cm for the outside area. Results from Method 2: -1.56logCFU/cm inside and -0.42logCFU/cm outside. There were no significant differences between the two methods. Both evisceration methods can produce carcasses that are of practically identical high hygienic quality.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.025 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!