Study Design: Retrospective case-control study.

Objective: To compare the incidence, management, and outcome of incidental durotomy in revision microdiscectomy with open and minimal-access surgery.

Summary Of Background Data: Incidental durotomy occurs with a variable incidence of 3%-27% in spine surgery. The highest rate occurs in revision microdiscectomy. The intraoperative and postoperative management of dural tears varies in the literature and the definite impact on clinical outcome has to be clarified.

Methods: This is a retrospective study of medical records of 135 patients who underwent revision microdiscectomy, divided into 2 subgroups: OPEN (n=82) versus minimal-access surgery (MINI, n=53). Occurrence of intraoperative dural tears, intraoperative and postoperative management of durotomy, and clinical outcomes, according to MacNab criteria, were retrospectively examined. Statistical comparisons for categorical values between groups were accomplished using the 2-tailed Fisher exact test. P-values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results: The incidence of durotomy in group OPEN was 19.5% (n=16/82) and in group MINI 17.0% (n=9/53) (P=0.822). The majority of durotomies (23/25) were repaired with an absorbable fibrin sealant patch alone. Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid fistula occurred only in 1 case of the OPEN group and was treated with lumbar drainage without the need for a reoperation. Patients with durotomy of the MINI group tended to have better outcome compared with those of the OPEN group without being statistically significant.

Conclusions: The incidence of durotomy and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid fistula in lumbar revision microdiscectomy does not significantly differ between minimal-access and standard open procedures. The application of a fibrin sealant patch alone is an effective strategy for dural repair in revision lumbar microdiscectomy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000279DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

revision microdiscectomy
16
incidental durotomy
12
incidence management
8
management outcome
8
intraoperative postoperative
8
postoperative management
8
dural tears
8
durotomy open
4
open versus
4
versus tubular
4

Similar Publications

The urgent etiological diagnosis represents the main management objective of cervical spondylodiscitis (CSD) to start as soon as possible antibiotic treatment to prevent neurological deterioration. The present study aimed to evaluate a multicenter experience implementing a minimally invasive surgical approach (MISA) to manage CSD such pathology vs the most complex and aggressive surgical strategies currently used.This retrospective multicenter study used a database of 70 patients from five European neurosurgical centers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation and Revision Surgery Rates After Single-Level Lumbar Microdiscectomy in the Military Population.

J Am Acad Orthop Surg

December 2024

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda MD (Colantonio, Fredericks, Cady, Schlaff, Helgeson, and Wagner), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda MD (Colantonio, Fredericks, Elsenbeck, Schlaff, Christensen, Helgeson, and Wagner), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martin Army Community Hospital, Ft. Benning GA (Elsenbeck), and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Naval Hospital Pensacola, Pensacola FL (Christensen).

Background: Lumbar microdiscectomy remains the most commonly performed surgical procedure for symptomatic lumbar disk herniation (LDH). Despite advances in surgical techniques, recurrent LDH (rLDH) ranges from 5% to 24%, representing the most common cause of surgical failure and revision surgery. Optimal treatment of reherniation remains controversial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Microdiscectomy is a common surgical method for treating lumbar disc herniation, but issues like postoperative epidural fibrosis can hinder recovery.
  • The ligamentum flavum flap technique, which preserves the ligamentum flavum, reduces this fibrosis and improves long-term outcomes.
  • The surgical procedure involves exposing the L5-S1 interlaminar space, creating a flap from the ligamentum flavum, performing discectomy, and then repositioning the flap to minimize scarring.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Lumbar microdiscectomy is a common surgery for treating symptomatic lumbar herniation, and this study focused on comparing outcomes between primary and revision surgeries.
  • Researchers used a large database to analyze data from over 37,000 patients who had either primary or revision surgery from 2019 to 2022, excluding patients with sepsis or cancer.
  • The results showed that patients undergoing revision surgery had longer hospital stays and higher rates of complications like wound infections and bleeding events than those who had primary surgeries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) involves the displacement of disc material, causing symptoms like radiculopathy and significant healthcare utilization.
  • Current treatments include epidural steroid injections (ESIs) and lumbar discectomy, but ESIs have limited long-term benefits and potential risks, while discectomy can lead to complications and recurrent issues.
  • Emerging treatments in development aim to provide better, less invasive options for LDH, including sustained-release ESIs and new methods to reduce disc material without surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!