AI Article Synopsis

  • Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is gaining traction as a reliable method for identifying mycobacterial species and testing for drug resistance compared to standard laboratory methods.
  • In a study involving 2,039 mycobacterial isolates, WGS successfully identified 96% of clinically relevant species and showed a high concordance rate of 99.3% for first-line drug resistance predictions.
  • Despite similar processing times of around 20-21 days for both WGS and routine tests, there is still room for improvement in the accuracy of WGS predictions, particularly for cases with insufficient sequencing data.

Article Abstract

Use of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) for routine mycobacterial species identification and drug susceptibility testing (DST) is becoming a reality. We compared the performances of WGS and standard laboratory workflows prospectively, by parallel processing at a major mycobacterial reference service over the course of 1 year, for species identification, first-line resistance prediction, and turnaround time. Among 2,039 isolates with line probe assay results for species identification, 74 (3.6%) failed sequencing or WGS species identification. Excluding these isolates, clinically important species were identified for 1,902 isolates, of which 1,825 (96.0%) were identified as the same species by WGS and the line probe assay. A total of 2,157 line probe test results for detection of resistance to the first-line drugs isoniazid and rifampin were available for 728 complex isolates. Excluding 216 (10.0%) cases where there were insufficient sequencing data for WGS to make a prediction, overall concordance was 99.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 98.9 to 99.6%), sensitivity was 97.6% (91.7 to 99.7%), and specificity was 99.5% (99.0 to 99.7%). A total of 2,982 phenotypic DST results were available for 777 complex isolates. Of these, 356 (11.9%) had no WGS comparator due to insufficient sequencing data, and in 154 (5.2%) cases the WGS prediction was indeterminate due to discovery of novel, previously uncharacterized mutations. Excluding these data, overall concordance was 99.2% (98.7 to 99.5%), sensitivity was 94.2% (88.4 to 97.6%), and specificity was 99.4% (99.0 to 99.7%). Median processing times for the routine laboratory tests versus WGS were similar overall, i.e., 20 days (interquartile range [IQR], 15 to 31 days) and 21 days (15 to 29 days), respectively ( = 0.41). In conclusion, WGS predicts species and drug susceptibility with great accuracy, but work is needed to increase the proportion of predictions made.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786738PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01480-17DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

species identification
20
drug susceptibility
12
wgs
9
whole-genome sequencing
8
species
8
mycobacterial species
8
identification drug
8
susceptibility testing
8
sequencing wgs
8
probe assay
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!