AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to understand how medicines are selected for primary health care across different regions in Brazil, focusing on the processes involved.
  • It uses data from a national survey that included interviews with pharmaceutical service providers, medicine dispensers, and physicians to assess their knowledge and perceptions about the Essential Medicines list.
  • Findings reveal a lack of formal Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committees, mixed awareness about procedures to amend the medicines list, and varying opinions on whether the list meets local health needs.

Article Abstract

Objective: To characterize the process of selection of medicines for primary health care in the Brazilian regions.

Methods: This article is part of the Pesquisa Nacional sobre Acesso, Utilização e Promoção do Uso Racional de Medicamentos - Serviços, 2015 (PNAUM - National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines - Services, 2015), a cross-sectional study that consisted of an information gathering in a sample of cities in the five regions of Brazil. The data used were collected by interviews with those responsible for pharmaceutical services (PS) (n = 506), professionals responsible for the dispensing of medicines (n = 1,139), and physicians (n = 1,558). To evaluate the difference between ratios, we adopted the Chi-square test for complex samples. The differences between the averages were analyzed in generalized linear models with F-test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The analyses considered significant had p≤0.05.

Results: The professionals responsible for pharmaceutical services reported non-existence of a formally constituted Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee (PTC) (12.5%). They claimed to have an updated (80.4%) list of Essential Medicines (85.3%) and being active participants of this process (88.2%). However, in the perception of respondents, the list only partially (70.1%) meets the health demands. Of the interviewed professionals responsible for the dispensing of medicines, only 16.6% were pharmacists; even so, 47.8% reported to know the procedures to change the list. From the perspective of most of these professionals (70.9%), the list meets the health demands of the city. Among physicians, only 27.2% reported to know the procedures to change the list, but 76.5% would have some claim to change it. Most of them reported to base their claims in clinical experiences (80.0%). For 13.0% of them, the list meets the health demands.

Conclusions: As this is the first national survey of characterization of the process of selection of medicines within primary health care, it brings unpublished data for the assessment of policies related to medicines in Brazil.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5676384PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051007065DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

selection medicines
12
primary health
12
health care
12
professionals responsible
12
meets health
12
medicines
8
process selection
8
medicines primary
8
national survey
8
responsible pharmaceutical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!