Magnetic Resonance Enterography to Assess Multifocal and Multicentric Bowel Endometriosis.

J Minim Invasive Gynecol

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tenon Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France; Groupe de Recherche Clinique 6, Centre Expert En Endométriose, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France; Unité Médicale de Recherche S938, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France. Electronic address:

Published: May 2019

Study Objective: To prospectively determine the accuracy of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) compared with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for multifocal (i.e., multiple lesions affecting the same digestive segment) and multicentric (i.e., multiple lesions affecting several digestive segments) bowel endometriosis.

Design: A prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

Setting: Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France.

Patients: Patients with MRI-suspected colorectal endometriosis scheduled for colorectal resection from April 2014 to February 2016 were included.

Interventions: Patients underwent both 1.5-Tesla MRI and MRE as well as laparoscopically assisted and open colorectal resections.

Measurements And Main Results: The diagnostic performance of MRI and MRE was evaluated for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs). The interobserver variability of the experienced and junior radiologists was quantified using weighted statistics. Forty-seven patients were included. Twenty-two (46.8%) patients had unifocal lesions, 14 (30%) had multifocal lesions, and 11 (23.4%) had multicentric lesions. The sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, and negative LR for the diagnosis of multifocal lesions were 0.29 (6/21), 1.00 (23/24), 15.36, and 0.71 for MRI and 0.57 (12/21), 0.89 (23/25), 4.95, and 0.58 for MRE. The sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, and negative LR for the diagnosis of multicentric lesions were 0.18 (1/11), 1.00 (1/1), 15, and 0.80 for MRI and 0.46 (5/11), 0.92 (33/36), 5.45, and 0.60 for MRE. Lower accuracies for MRI compared with MRE to diagnose multicentric (p = .01) and multifocal lesions (p = .004) were noted. The interobserver agreement for MRE was good for both multifocality (κ = 0.80) and multicentricity (κ = 0.61).

Conclusion: MRE has better accuracy for diagnosing multifocal and multicentric bowel endometriosis than conventional MRI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.10.037DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

positive negative
16
magnetic resonance
12
sensitivity specificity
12
specificity positive
12
multifocal lesions
12
resonance enterography
8
multifocal multicentric
8
multicentric bowel
8
bowel endometriosis
8
mre
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!