A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Impact of upper body precooling during warm-up on subsequent time trial paced cycling in the heat. | LitMetric

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that cooling the upper body during a warm-up enhances performance during a subsequent 16.1-km simulated cycling time trial in a hot environment.

Design: Counterbalanced, repeated measures design.

Methods: Eight trained, male cyclists (peak oxygen uptake=57.8±5.0mLkgmin) completed two simulated 16.1-km time trials in a hot environment (35.0±0.5°C, 43.8±2.0% relative humidity) each separated by 72h. Treatments were counterbalanced; participants warmed up for 20min while either wearing head and neck ice wraps and an ice vest (COOLING) or no cooling apparatus (CONTROL).

Results: Following the warm-up mean skin temperature (T¯), mean body temperature (T¯) and rating of thermal comfort were significantly lower than baseline following the COOLING trial (all P<0.05); however, rectal temperature was unaffected (P=0.35). Because the effects of precooling on T¯ and T¯ were not sustained during exercise, values for COOLING and CONTROL were not different throughout the time trial (P=0.38). Nonetheless, time to completion was significantly faster following the COOLING intervention when compared to the CONTROL (29.3±3.6min, vs. 30.3±3.1min; P=0.04).

Conclusions: These data suggest that in short distance time trials in hot conditions cyclists may benefit from utilizing a cooling modality during the warm-up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2017.10.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

upper body
8
time trial
8
temperature t¯
8
impact upper
4
body precooling
4
precooling warm-up
4
warm-up subsequent
4
subsequent time
4
trial paced
4
paced cycling
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!