Nursing Home Compare (NHC) publishes composite quality ratings of nursing homes based on a five-star rating system, a system that has been subject to controversy about its validity. Using in-depth interviews, we assess the views of nursing home administrators and staff on NHC and unearth strategies used to improve ratings. Respondents revealed conflicting goals and strategies. Although nursing home managers monitor the ratings and expend effort to improve scores, competing goals of revenue maximization and avoidance of litigation often overshadow desire to score well on NHC. Some of the improvement strategies simply involve coding changes that have no effect on resident outcomes. Many respondents doubted the validity of the self-reported staffing data and stated that lack of risk adjustment biases ratings. Policy makers should consider nursing home incentives when refining the system, aiming to improve the validity of the self-reported domains to provide incentives for broader quality improvement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7585399PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077558717725165DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nursing compare
8
validity self-reported
8
nursing
7
nursing response
4
response nursing
4
compare provider
4
provider perspective
4
perspective nursing
4
compare nhc
4
nhc publishes
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!