Trajectory of instantaneous axis of rotation in fixed lumbar spine with instrumentation.

J Orthop Surg Res

Department of Spinal Surgery and Medical Engineering, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu City, 514-8507, Mie prefecture, Japan.

Published: November 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the trajectory of the instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR) in both healthy and damaged spines of deer, focusing on lumbar segments.
  • The methodology involved testing various spinal models—normal, damaged, and fixed with pedicle screws—through bending and rotation tests to observe IAR movement.
  • Findings revealed that the IAR in the damaged model showed greater displacement and scattering compared to the normal model, while the IAR in the fixed (PS) model remained stable, indicating differing mechanical loads on the surrounding structures.

Article Abstract

Background: Several studies showed instantaneous axis of rotation (IAR) in the intact spine. However, there has been no report on the trajectory of the IAR of a damaged spine or that of a fixed spine with instrumentation. It is the aim of this study to investigate the trajectory of the IAR of the lumbar spine using the vertebra of deer.

Methods: Functional spinal units (L5-6) from five deer were evaluated with six-axis material testing machine. As specimen models, we prepared a normal model, a damaged model, and a pedicle screw (PS) model. We measured the IAR during bending in the coronal and sagittal planes and axial rotation. In the bending test, four directions were measured: anterior, posterior, right, and left. In the rotation test, two directions were measured: right and left.

Results: The IAR of the normal model during bending moved in the bending direction. The IAR of the damaged model during bending moved in the bending direction, but the magnitude of displacement was bigger compared to that of the normal model. In the PS model, the IAR during bending test hardly moved. During rotation test, the IAR of the normal model and PS model located in the spinal canal, but the IAR of the damaged model located in the posterior part of the vertebral body.

Conclusions: In this study, the IAR of damaged model was scattering and that of PS model was concentrating. This suggests that higher mechanical load applied to the dura tube and nerve roots in the damaged model and less mechanical load applied to that in the PS model.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5689179PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-017-0677-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

damaged model
20
iar damaged
16
normal model
16
model
14
iar
10
instantaneous axis
8
axis rotation
8
lumbar spine
8
spine instrumentation
8
trajectory iar
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!