A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validation of the Microlife BP A3 PC upper arm blood pressure monitor in patients with diabetes mellitus according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2: 2013 protocol. | LitMetric

Objective: The aim of the present study was to validate the blood pressure (BP) measurement device, Microlife BP A3 PC, in patients with diabetes mellitus, according to the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 protocol.

Patients And Methods: In 85 individuals aged 56-88 years, with predefined criteria for diabetes mellitus, BP measurements on the upper arm were performed alternately using the Microlife BP A3 PC and a standard mercury reference sphygmomanometer. A total of 333 comparisons were included for analysis.

Results: The mean difference between the Microlife BP A3 PC and the reference was -1.5±6.3 mmHg for systolic BP (SBP) and -1.3±5.2 mmHg for diastolic BP (DBP) according to criterion 1 of the protocol. For SBP, a total of 209 of the 333 measurements were within the range of 5 mmHg (62.8%), whereas the corresponding numbers for DBP were 232 of 333 (69.7%). For criterion 2, the intraindividual differences for the test device and the reference were -1.50±4.73 mmHg for SBP and -1.30±4.55 mmHg for DBP, thus being within the defined ranges provided by the protocol.

Conclusion: The Microlife BP A3 PC fulfilled the requirements of criteria 1 and 2 of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 protocol and can also be recommended for BP measurement in diabetic patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MBP.0000000000000302DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diabetes mellitus
12
upper arm
8
blood pressure
8
patients diabetes
8
mellitus ansi/aami/iso
8
ansi/aami/iso 81060-22013
8
validation microlife
4
microlife upper
4
arm blood
4
pressure monitor
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!