Whether age at time of diagnosis impacts the clinical presentation or long-term outcome of early Lyme disease is unknown. Subjects enrolled in this study had culture-confirmed early Lyme disease and were followed up annually in a long-term prospective study. Subjects ≤50years of age were compared with those who were ≥51years of age at time of study entry. Of the 283 enrolled subjects, the ≥51year old age group was significantly more likely to be female (P=0.0095) and to be compliant with long-term follow-up of at least 11years duration (P=0.0119). There were no significant differences between the two age groups with regard to any of the other variables assessed at presentation. For the 128 subjects who were followed up for 11-20years, there was no significant difference between the two age groups in the frequency, number or type of residual symptoms. The older age group at study entry, however, was significantly more likely to develop an intercurrent comorbidity (P=0.0017), and there was a trend toward a greater likelihood of having an intercurrent hospitalization (P=0.0311). Among the 128 subjects followed up for 11-20years, the older age group at study entry returned for a significantly greater number of follow-up visits (P=0.0129). In conclusion, older age at the time of diagnosis of early Lyme disease did not impact the initial clinical features or long-term outcome of this infection. Not unexpectedly, older patients had more comorbidities during long-term follow-up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.09.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

early lyme
16
lyme disease
16
long-term outcome
12
age time
12
study entry
12
age group
12
older age
12
age
10
clinical features
8
culture-confirmed early
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!