Learning to associate unambiguous sensory cues with rewarded choices is known to be mediated by dopamine (DA) neurons. However, little is known about how these neurons behave when choices rely on uncertain reward-predicting stimuli. To study this issue we reanalyzed DA recordings from monkeys engaged in the detection of weak tactile stimuli delivered at random times and formulated a reinforcement learning model based on belief states. Specifically, we investigated how the firing activity of DA neurons should behave if they were coding the error in the prediction of the total future reward when animals made decisions relying on uncertain sensory and temporal information. Our results show that the same signal that codes for reward prediction errors also codes the animal's certainty about the presence of the stimulus and the temporal expectation of sensory cues.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5715768 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712479114 | DOI Listing |
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
Neuroscience Institute, NYU Langone Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Background: The entorhinal cortex and hippocampus are loci of early vulnerability in AD. These areas are crucial for episodic memory processing for space and contexts. The majority of AD model mouse imaging and electrode studies utilize simple tasks such open field and linear track.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAlzheimers Dement
December 2024
Memory & Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California in San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Background: Recent international work suggests that more precise subtyping within frontotemporal dementia (FTD) syndromes leads to better prediction of pathology, supporting individualized disease-specific treatments. Recent studies emphasize that identification of one such subtype, semantic behavioral variant FTD (sbvFTD), relies in part on measuring emotion recognition abilities.
Method: In order to evaluate the effectiveness of current tools, we compared the brief video-based Dynamic Affect Recognition Test (DART) against the TASIT Emotion Evaluation (EET) and Comprehensive Affect Testing System Affect Matching tests.
New Phytol
January 2025
Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.
Plants produce floral nectar as a reward for pollinators, which contains carbohydrates and amino acids (AAs). We designed experiments to test whether pollinators could exert selection pressure on the profiles of AAs in nectar. We used HPLC to measure the free AAs and sugars in the nectar of 102 UK plant species.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNat Commun
January 2025
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, 15219, USA.
Cue reactivity is the maladaptive neurobiological and behavioral response upon exposure to drug cues and is a major driver of relapse. A widely accepted assumption is that drugs of abuse result in disparate dopamine responses to cues that predict drug vs. natural rewards.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!