A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

In Vitro Kinematic Assessment of a Hinged Elbow Orthosis Following Lateral Collateral Ligament Injury. | LitMetric

In Vitro Kinematic Assessment of a Hinged Elbow Orthosis Following Lateral Collateral Ligament Injury.

J Hand Surg Am

Roth-McFarlane Hand & Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Published: February 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a hinged elbow orthosis (HEO) in stabilizing the elbow after lateral collateral ligament injuries (LCLI).
  • Researchers tested seven cadaver arms using a simulator to observe how different arm and forearm positions impacted elbow stability before and after injury, and with the orthosis.
  • Results showed that the HEO did not enhance elbow stability during active motion, indicating potential risks when muscle activation is low; it's recommended to brace the forearm in pronation when using the HEO post-injury.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Elbow lateral collateral ligament injuries (LCLI) are often managed with protected mobilization using a hinged elbow orthosis (HEO). The objective of this investigation was to determine the effectiveness of an HEO in stabilizing the elbow following LCLI.

Methods: Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremity specimens were studied using a custom simulator that enabled elbow motion via computer-controlled actuators and servomotors attached to relevant tendons. Specimens were examined in 4 arm positions (dependent, overhead, horizontal, and varus) and 2 forearm positions (pronation and supination) during both passive and simulated active elbow extension. Specimens were examined before and after simulated LCLI, and then with the addition of an HEO. The lateral collateral ligament, common extensor origin, and lateral elbow capsule were sectioned in the injury model. An electromagnetic tracking system measured ulnohumeral kinematics.

Results: The orthosis did not change elbow stability in any arm position during active motion. Muscle activation and forearm pronation enhanced stability in the dependent, horizontal, and varus positions while the HEO was applied.

Conclusions: This HEO does not improve the in vitro stability of the elbow following simulated LCLI.

Clinical Relevance: An HEO may be safe to use during active motion, but when a patient is not activating the muscles normally (ie, owing to fatigue or cognitive impairment) and the arm is in positions in which the weight of the orthosis might increase joint distraction, an HEO may be harmful. If an HEO is used, the forearm should be braced in pronation following LCLI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.09.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lateral collateral
12
collateral ligament
12
elbow
9
hinged elbow
8
elbow orthosis
8
heo
8
specimens examined
8
arm positions
8
horizontal varus
8
active motion
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!