Background: Biomarkers can be used as prognostic, predictive, or monitoring indicators of an associated outcome. The purpose of this review was to provide a comprehensive summary of the research examining the use of biomarkers as surrogate end points for clinical outcomes in family caregivers for cancer patients, identify gaps, and make recommendations for future research.
Methods: A scoping review, a process of mapping the existing literature, was conducted. Studies comparing biomarkers across caregivers and controls and/or examining relationships between biomarkers and psychological health were reviewed.
Results: The studies ( N = 18) of caregivers for cancer patients who were identified used biomarkers to predict outcomes ( n = 13) and to monitor the efficacy of interventions ( n = 6). Biomarkers were divided into two categories based on physiological systems involved: (1) neuroendocrine function (sympathetic-adrenal-medullary axis activity, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity) and (2) immune function. Predictive biomarkers were sensitive to differences between caregivers and controls. The biomarkers were used to evaluate outcomes frequently associated with stress, depression, and anxiety. Cortisol was the biomarker most commonly measured to monitor the efficacy of interventions.
Discussion: Biomarkers are most commonly incorporated into caregiver studies to predict group membership and psychological health. Neuroendocrine biomarkers, specifically cortisol, are most frequently assessed. Future research should include biomarkers of other physiologic functions (e.g., cardiovascular function, cognitive dysfunction, and cell aging) and those that serve as multisystem indicators. Expanding the scientific study of biomarkers will contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms through which stress may influence caregiver health.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6346308 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1099800417740970 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Importance: Health systems are increasingly required to conduct health-related social needs screening. However, how social resources negatively and positively affect recovery from acute illnesses, such as COVID-19, is incompletely understood.
Objective: To examine how social determinants of health (SDOH) influence recovery from COVID-19.
J Cancer Educ
January 2025
Biomedical and Translational Research Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy, and Dental Medicine, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fes, Morocco.
In Morocco, family caregivers of cancer patients face significant challenges due to the absence of legal recognition and structured support systems. This article highlights the urgent need to develop alternative solutions to meet their specific needs. It explores the potential of online platforms to enhance caregivers' skills and provide essential psychological support.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAndes Pediatr
October 2024
Escuela de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Unlabelled: Cancer remains one of the most important diseases in public health.
Objective: To estimate 5-year survival in pediatric cancer patients affected by FN, according to clinical-demographic variables.
Patients And Method: Survival, prognostic, and analytical study with historical cohort.
Andes Pediatr
August 2024
Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Unlabelled: Retinoblastoma (Rb) is the most common intraocular cancer in children and, along with its treatment, can negatively impact the Quality of Life (QoL). Few studies have explored this subject in these patients; none in Latin America.
Objective: To evaluate the general, physical, emotional, social, and school quality of life of patients treated for Rb and to analyze which patient, disease, or treatment factors are associated with worse outcomes.
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs
December 2024
College of Nursing, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Objective: Family caregivers (FCGs) of cancer patients who are in hospice experience psychological challenges and poor quality of life (QOL) as a consequence of caregiving demands and anticipatory loss. Supportive interventions are needed. Exposure to nature offers a source of relaxation; however, FCGs are often homebound and have limited opportunities for respite.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!