Multimodal integration of spontaneously produced representational co-speech gestures: an fMRI study.

Lang Cogn Neurosci

Laboratory for Language and Cognitive Neuroscience, San Diego State University, 6495 Alvarado Rd., Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92120, USA, 619-594-8069,

Published: October 2016

To examine whether more ecologically valid co-speech gesture stimuli elicit brain responses consistent with those found by studies that relied on scripted stimuli, we presented participants with spontaneously produced, meaningful co-speech gesture during fMRI scanning (n = 28). Speech presented with gesture (versus either presented alone) elicited heightened activity in bilateral posterior superior temporal, premotor, and inferior frontal regions. Within left temporal and premotor, but not inferior frontal regions, we identified small clusters with superadditive responses, suggesting that these discrete regions support both sensory and semantic integration. In contrast, surrounding areas and the inferior frontal gyrus may support either sensory semantic integration. Reduced activation for speech with gesture in language-related regions indicates allocation of fewer neural resources when meaningful gestures accompany speech. Sign language experience did not affect co-speech gesture activation. Overall, our results indicate that scripted stimuli have minimal confounding influences; however, they may miss subtle superadditive effects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5675577PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1245426DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

co-speech gesture
12
inferior frontal
12
spontaneously produced
8
scripted stimuli
8
temporal premotor
8
premotor inferior
8
frontal regions
8
support sensory
8
sensory semantic
8
semantic integration
8

Similar Publications

Studies of the evolution of language rely heavily on comparisons to nonhuman primates, particularly the gestural communication of nonhuman apes. Differences between human and ape gestures are largely ones of degree rather than kind. For example, while human gestures are more flexible, ape gestures are not inflexible.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Hand movements frequently occur with speech. The extent to which the memories that guide co-speech hand movements are tied to the speech they occur with is unclear. Here, we paired the acquisition of a new hand movement with speech.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Humans rarely speak without producing co-speech gestures of the hands, head, and other parts of the body. Co-speech gestures are also highly restricted in how they are timed with speech, typically synchronizing with prosodically-prominent syllables. What functional principles underlie this relationship? Here, we examine how the production of co-speech manual gestures influences spatiotemporal patterns of the oral articulators during speech production.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Forms and Functions of Gestures in Preverbal 12- to 15-Months Old Infants.

Infancy

December 2024

Centre de Recherche en Psychologie et Neurosciences (CRPN), CNRS, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.

Speech and co-speech gestures always go hand in hand. Whether we find the precursors of these co-speech gestures in infants before they master their native language still remains an open question. Except for deictic gestures, there is little agreement on the existence of iconic, non-referential and conventional gestures before children start producing their first words.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Characterizing iconic gesture during narratives in chronic traumatic brain injury recovery.

Front Hum Neurosci

November 2024

Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, United States.

Article Synopsis
  • Co-speech hand gestures can help individuals with language impairments, like those after a brain injury, communicate more effectively, particularly in cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI).
  • A study with 54 individuals with moderate-severe TBI found that they used various iconic gestures while narrating a simple procedure, even though the relationship between their language impairment and gesturing was complex.
  • Longitudinal analysis indicated that while iconic gesturing was consistent over 2 years of recovery, individual differences were observed, suggesting some relationships between language skills and the use of gestures in TBI patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!