Background: The Jarvik 2000 ventricular assist device features a miniaturized intraventricular pump and an intermittent low-speed function that facilitates aortic valve opening. Despite its long history, little is known about the Jarvik device with regard to post-implantation outcomes.

Methods: Prospectively collected data from 13 participating hospitals were extracted from the Japanese Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support database to analyze mortality, morbidity and de-novo aortic regurgitation. Data on 83 patients who underwent implantation of the Jarvik 2000 were reviewed. Median support duration was 191 (maximum 758) days. All recipients underwent implantation as a bridge to transplantation.

Results: Overall survival proportions at 1 and 2 years were 85.0% and 79.3%, respectively. Nine patients were in INTERMACS Level 1, and 28 patients were on mechanical circulatory support at the time of implantation. Causes of death included stroke, infection and device malfunction. Three patients had their device removed: 2 at the time of heart transplantation and 1 after recovery of the left ventricle. Common adverse events included major bleeding (27.7%), new infection (31.3%), stroke (20.5%) and device malfunction (20.5%). De-novo aortic regurgitation was observed in 17 patients, 6 of whom developed at least moderate regurgitation during follow-up.

Conclusions: Mid-term survival after Jarvik 2000 implantation was satisfactory and comparable to that reported by other national and international registries (INTERMACS and IMACS) for continuous-flow LVADs. De novo aortic regurgitation occurred despite the intermittent low-speed effect of this device, with some recipients experiencing progressive worsening of aortic regurgitation within 2 years post-implantation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2017.10.016DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

jarvik 2000
16
aortic regurgitation
16
circulatory support
12
ventricular assist
8
assist device
8
japanese registry
8
registry mechanically
8
mechanically assisted
8
assisted circulatory
8
intermittent low-speed
8

Similar Publications

Comparative analysis of survival rate and quality of life in axial-flow pump left ventricular assist devices (LVADs).

Heart Lung

November 2024

Shanghai Interventional Medical Device Engineering Technology Research Center, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China. Electronic address:

Background: The rising heart failure rates globally show the pressing demand for treatment progress, especially in Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs). Axial-flow pump LVADs are gaining notice for their small size, few moving parts, and potential for miniaturization, providing a vital option for heart transplants during donor shortages.

Objectives: Despite several studies on LVADs, there is a notable lack of research specifically comparing axial-flow pumps with similar technology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Driveline infection in patients with implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) remains common and crucial. Once a driveline exit-site infection reaches the LVAD component, radical treatment such as LVAD exchange may become necessary, although the clinical results are unsatisfactory. The Jarvik 2000 device, which utilizes a postauricular cable, allows the driveline to exit the body behind the ear (postauricular) instead of through an abdominal site.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device after surgical left ventricular restoration.

Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

August 2023

Department of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.

Objectives: This study aimed to report the clinical outcomes of continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation in end-stage chronic heart failure patients with a history of surgical left ventricular restoration.

Methods: We retrospectively identified 190 patients undergoing continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation at our center from November 2007 to April 2020. In total, six patients underwent continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation after various types of surgical left ventricular restoration procedures, including endoventricular circular patch plasty (n = 3), posterior restoration procedure (n = 2), and septal anterior ventricular exclusion (n = 1).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Progress and Pitfalls: Lessons From the Jarvik 2000 Trial.

ASAIO J

February 2023

From the Department of Cardiology, Section of Heart Failure, Transplant and Mechanical Circulatory Support, Cleveland Clinic Heart and Vascular Institute, Weston, Florida.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist device in a narrow lumen is technically challenging to secure an optimal support. We experienced a patient with the transposition of the great arteries after the Senning procedure who was initially implanted with Jarvik 2000®. She presented with worsening heart failure symptoms 2 years after implanting Jarvik 2000®.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!