A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

With or without consolidation chemotherapy using cisplatin/5-FU after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage II-III squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: A propensity score-matched analysis. | LitMetric

Background And Purpose: The benefit of consolidation chemotherapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of consolidation chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with the same agents in patients with stage II-III disease.

Material And Methods: Data for patients with stage II-III squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus treated with CCRT were retroactively reviewed. Patients who received CCRT alone (observation group) were compared with those who underwent CCRT followed by consolidation chemotherapy (consolidation group) with regard to progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment failure and toxicity. Differences in baseline characteristics were adjusted using the propensity score matching method.

Results: From September 2006 to September 2012, 812 patients were recruited (n = 272 for observation; n = 540 for consolidation). Among them, 290 (35.7%) had clinical stage II disease and 522 (64.3%) had stage III disease. In the overall study cohort, the median progression-free survival (22.1 months vs. 22.0 months, P = 0.917) and median overall survival (33.8 months vs. 31.3 months, P = 0.591) were comparable between the observation group and consolidation group. Comparisons of the observation and consolidation group in the matched population (262 patients in each group) showed median progression-free survival of 23.0 months and 25.4 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.74-1.15; P = 0.491), and median overall survival of 34.6 months and 35.0 months (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.80-1.27; P = 0.919), respectively. There were no significant differences in local/regional failure and persistence disease (50.4% vs. 48.5%) and distant failure (10.7% vs. 8.8%) between the two groups.

Conclusions: Compared to CCRT alone, consolidation chemotherapy did not further prolong progression-free survival and overall survival for patients with stage II-III squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The role of consolidation therapy needs to be studied further.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.10.031DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

consolidation chemotherapy
20
stage ii-iii
16
squamous cell
16
cell carcinoma
16
carcinoma esophagus
16
progression-free survival
16
ii-iii squamous
12
patients stage
12
consolidation group
12
consolidation
10

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!