Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of silver nitrate/fluoride varnish (SN/FV) on care costs.

Methods: A retrospective matched cohort study, using Oregon Medicaid claims (January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014) for patients younger than 21 years old, compared patients treated with SN/FV to matched patients not treated with SN/FV. The number of services and costs were compared using student's t test and generalized estimating equation (GEE) regression models.

Results: Patients treated with SN/FV (n equals 4,612) and matched patients treated conventionally (n equals 13,498) averaged 28±7 (SD) months of continuous eligibility based on initial treatment date. The number of first-year services and total services over an average of 28 months were higher for patients treated with SN/FV (10.6 versus 6.7 in year one; 19.3 versus 8.8 overall; P<0.0001). Excluding diagnostic/preventive services, costs were higher in patients treated conventionally than patients treated with SN/FV in the first year. Overall costs were similar ($698 versus $707; P=.52). The average number of services was 58 percent higher (95 percent confidence interval [CI] 1.54 to 1.63) for patients treated with SN/FV, but costs remained similar.

Conclusion: Patients treated with silver nitrate/fluoride varnish accrued a greater number of services and higher total costs over approximately 28 months but lower treatment costs than patients treated conventionally.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients treated
20
treated sn/fv
16
silver nitrate/fluoride
8
nitrate/fluoride varnish
8
matched patients
8
patients
7
sn/fv
5
treated
5
costs resource
4
resource child
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!