A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Bone Resorption During Submerged Healing After Guided Bone Regeneration: A Prospective Case Series. | LitMetric

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate bone resorption quantitatively during the healing period subsequent to ridge augmentation.

Materials And Methods: Sixteen patients requiring vertical ridge augmentation before implant placement were recruited in the study. The study used an allograft and nonresorbable membrane. A custom acrylic stent was used to measure changes in bone volume. Augmented bone was compared with remaining bone 6 months after guided bone regeneration (α = 0.05 by means of the paired t test).

Results: All sites following the six months post-surgery were analyzed. Overall changes in alveolar bone were observed with a mean resorption rate of 19.8% (p<0.001). The vertical bone measurement indicated a mean resorption rate of 22.8% (range = 18.5% - 26.5%). The horizontal measurement indicated a mean resorption rate of 18.7% (range = 12.6% - 26.0%). Among the sixteen sites, four sites with post-operative complications including membrane exposure showed an average of 42.1% resorption rates.

Conclusion: Loss in graft quantity was observed after ridge augmentation using an allograft and nonresorbable membrane during submerged healing before implant placement. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to confirm its findings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000686DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bone
8
bone resorption
8
guided bone
8
bone regeneration
8
resorption submerged
4
submerged healing
4
healing guided
4
regeneration prospective
4
prospective case
4
case series
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!