Comparison of pre-contact joint kinematics and vertical impulse between vertical jump landings and step-off landings from equal heights.

Hum Mov Sci

Department of Kinesiology & Nutrition Sciences, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Box 3034, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA.

Published: December 2017

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compared pre-contact kinematics and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) impulse in vertical jump landings (VJL) versus step-off landings (STL) using ten healthy adults.
  • Significant differences in joint angles were found, with STL showing greater hip and knee flexion, while VJL exhibited greater plantarflexion angles.
  • The results indicated unique pre-contact strategies and post-contact force dynamics for each landing task, suggesting that training should align with the specific needs of the target population.

Article Abstract

Although impact phase differences between vertical jump landings (VJL) and step-off landings (STL) may be related to task-specific pre-contact strategies, pre-contact mechanics are rarely examined. Thus, pre-contact kinematics and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) impulse were examined between VJL and STL. Ten health adults (20.9 ± 1.6 yrs; 167.8 ± 4.2 cm; 68.5 ± 7.15 kg) performed 15 VJL and 15 STL from equal heights. Limb (lead; trail) by task (VJL; STL) ANOVAs (α = 0.05) compared hip, knee, and ankle joint angles 150 ms pre-contact, 100 ms pre-contact, 50 ms pre-contact, and at ground contact. Joint angular displacement was also evaluated between 150 ms pre-contact and ground contact. vGRF impulse was compared during the loading (ground contact to peak vGRF) and attenuation (peak vGRF to end of impact) phases. Greater hip flexion angles occurred during STL versus VJL at each event except 150 ms pre-contact (p ≤ .004). Trail limb knee flexion angles were greater at each event when compared to the lead limb during STL (p ≤ .019). Greater trail limb knee flexion angles occurred during STL versus VJL at all four events (p ≤ .018), while greater plantarflexion angles occurred at all four events during VJL versus STL (p ≤ .034). During STL, greater trail limb plantarflexion angles were detected at each event versus the lead limb (p < .001). Lesser hip, lead and trail limb knee displacement occurred during STL versus VJL (p < .05). Greater vGRF impulse was detected during the loading phase of VJL (<.001), while greater vGRF impulse occurred during the attenuation phase of STL (p = .025). These tasks are characterized by distinct pre-contact kinematic strategies and post-contact kinetics. The task utilized in practice should reflect the requirements of the population of interest.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2017.10.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

vjl stl
12
150 ms pre-contact
12
ground contact
12
flexion angles
12
angles occurred
12
trail limb
12
stl
9
kinematics vertical
8
vertical jump
8
jump landings
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study compared vertical jump landings (VJL) and step-off landings (STL) in terms of their kinetic, kinematic, and temporal aspects, involving 10 participants (5 men and 5 women).
  • STL showed greater first peak vertical ground reaction force (F1) and quicker second peak reaction time (tF2) compared to VJL, despite similar impact velocities between the two landing types.
  • The findings suggest that for athletes looking to enhance landing performance and reduce impact forces, strength and conditioning coaches should evaluate the benefits of incorporating both landing techniques into training routines.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study compared pre-contact kinematics and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) impulse in vertical jump landings (VJL) versus step-off landings (STL) using ten healthy adults.
  • Significant differences in joint angles were found, with STL showing greater hip and knee flexion, while VJL exhibited greater plantarflexion angles.
  • The results indicated unique pre-contact strategies and post-contact force dynamics for each landing task, suggesting that training should align with the specific needs of the target population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!