Aims: Shock coil interaction in patients with multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads is occasionally observed. We aimed to evaluate the incidence of shock coil interaction and its clinical relevance.

Methods And Results: All ICD patients (646 patients) who came to follow up control in our ICD ambulance between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011 in the department of cardiology in Bad Berka hospital were retrospectively evaluated in this study. All baseline demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics and postoperative chest x ray in postero-anterior and lateral view as well as clinical and ICD follow up data were evaluated. Among 646 patients 42 had multiple ICD leads (6.5%) of whom 36 patients (5.5% of total cohort patients and 85.7% of patients with multiple ICD leads) had shock coil interaction and presented the study group (Group I). The control group (Group II) consisted of 610 patients without coil-coil interaction including patients with single shock lead (604 patients) or patients with multiple leads but without interaction between shock coils (6 patients). Inappropriate anti-tachycardia therapies and RV lead revisions were more frequent in patients with interaction between shock coils (Group I vs Group II: 27.7% and 5.7%; p = 0.049 and 30.6% vs 6.4; p = 0.0001, respectively).

Conclusions: Interaction between shock coils may be one of possible causes of lead failure and resulted in inappropriate therapies and subsequent lead revision.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5840847PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2017.10.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interaction shock
16
shock coils
16
patients multiple
16
patients
13
shock coil
12
coil interaction
12
icd leads
12
group group
12
interaction
8
inappropriate therapies
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!