Objective: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes among scheduled versus unscheduled deliveries in cases of prenatally diagnosed, pathologically proven placenta accreta.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort of placenta accreta cases delivered in five University of California hospitals.

Results: Of 151 cases of histopathologically proven placenta accreta, 82% were prenatally diagnosed. Sixty-seven percent of women underwent scheduled deliveries and 33% were unscheduled. There were no differences in demographics between groups except a higher rate of antepartum bleeding in the unscheduled delivery group (81 versus 53%; p = .003). Scheduled deliveries were associated with a later gestational age at delivery (34.6 versus 32.6 weeks; p = .001), lower blood loss (2.0 versus 2.5 l; p = .04), higher birth weight (2488 versus 2010 g; p < .001), shorter postpartum length of stay (4 versus 5 d; p = .03) and neonatal length of stay (12 versus 20 d; p = .005).

Conclusion: Despite a prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta, 1/3 of these cases require unscheduled delivery, portending poorer maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1395847DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prenatally diagnosed
12
proven placenta
12
placenta accreta
12
maternal neonatal
8
neonatal outcomes
8
outcomes scheduled
8
scheduled versus
8
versus unscheduled
8
unscheduled deliveries
8
diagnosed pathologically
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!