[Evaluation of stone size before flexible ureteroscopy: Which measurement is best?].

Prog Urol

Service d'urologie, cliniques universitaires de Bruxelles, hôpital Erasme-ULB, 808, route de Lennik, 1070 Bruxelles, Belgique. Electronic address:

Published: January 2018

Purpose: To retrospectively assess the clinical utility in ureteroscopy (URS) planning of radiological parameters as predictor of stone-free status after a single flexible ureteroscopy.

Material: Sixty-seven patients with renal stones treated by flexible URS were retrospectively evaluated. To assess the clinical utility of radiological parameters, relationships between stone-free (SF) status and stone burden (maximal diameter, calculated area, calculated volume, cumulative diameter, and tridimentionnal volume [V3D]) were analyzed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve and logistic regression.

Results: Maximal diameter (AUC=0.75), calculated area (AUC 0.79), calculated volume (AUC=0.79), cumulative diameter (AUC=0.80) and tridimensional volume (AUC=0.82) revealed ability to predict SF status after URS.

Conclusion: Stone burden evaluation is critical in predicting SF status after a single URS. Planar and volumetric measurements showed equal ability to predict SF status. V3D is more accurate but diameter measurement remains easier in clinical practice.

Level Of Evidence: 4.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2017.09.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

assess clinical
8
clinical utility
8
radiological parameters
8
stone-free status
8
status single
8
stone burden
8
maximal diameter
8
calculated area
8
calculated volume
8
cumulative diameter
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!