What Every Graduating Resident Needs to Know About Quality Improvement and Patient Safety: A Content Analysis of 26 Sets of ACGME Milestones.

Acad Med

M.B. Lane-Fall is assistant professor of anesthesiology and critical care and codirector, Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, senior fellow, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and fellow, Harold Amos Medical Faculty Development Program, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7050-0017. J.J. Davis is emergency medicine resident, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, and visiting scholar, American Board of Medical Specialties, Chicago, Illinois. J.T. Clapp is research associate, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. J.S. Myers is associate professor of clinical medicine, director, Center for Healthcare Improvement and Patient Safety, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, and director of quality and safety education, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. L.A. Riesenberg is professor of anesthesiology and perioperative medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

Published: June 2018

Purpose: Quality improvement (QI) and patient safety (PS) are broadly relevant to the practice of medicine, but specialty-specific milestones demonstrate variable expectations for trainee competency in QI/PS. The purpose of this study was to develop a unifying portrait of QI/PS expectations for graduating residents irrespective of specialty.

Method: Milestones from 26 residency programs representing the 24 member boards of the American Board of Medical Specialties were downloaded from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Web site in 2015. A codebook was generated by in-depth reading of all milestone sets by two authors. Using a content analytic approach, milestones were then coded by a single author, with a 25% sample double coded by another author. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize frequency counts.

Results: Of 612 total milestones, 249 (40.7%) made mention of QI/PS. A median 10 milestones per specialty (interquartile range, 5.25-11.75) mentioned QI/PS. There were 446 individual references to QI, 423 references to PS, and another 1,065 references to QI/PS-related concepts, including patient-centered care, cost-effective practice, documentation, equity, handoffs and care transitions, and teamwork. QI/PS references reflected expectations about both individual-level practice (531/869; 61.1%) and practice within a health care system (338/869; 38.9%). QI and PS references were linked to all six ACGME core competencies.

Conclusions: Although there is variability in the emphasis placed on QI/PS across specialties, overall, QI/PS is reflected in more than 40% of residency milestones. Graduating residents in all specialties are expected to demonstrate competence in QI, PS, and multiple related concepts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002039DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quality improvement
8
improvement patient
8
patient safety
8
graduating residents
8
milestones
7
qi/ps
7
references
5
graduating resident
4
resident quality
4
safety content
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!