Background: Common mental disorders (CMD) cause large suffering and high societal costs. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) can effectively treat CMD, but access to treatment is insufficient. Guided self-help (GSH) CBT, has shown effects comparable with face-to-face CBT. However, not all patients respond to GSH, and stepping up non-responders to face-to-face CBT, could yield larger response rates. The aim was to test a stepped care model for CMD in primary care by first evaluating the effects of GSH-CBT and secondly, for non-responders, evaluating the additional effect of face-to-face CBT.
Methods: Consecutive patients (N = 396) with a principal disorder of depression, anxiety, insomnia, adjustment or exhaustion disorder were included. In Step I, all patients received GSH-CBT. In Step II, non-responders were randomized to face-to-face CBT or continued GSH. The primary outcome was remission status, defined as a score below a pre-established cutoff on a validated disorder-specific scale.
Results: After GSH-CBT in Step I, 40% of patients were in remission. After Step II, 39% of patients following face-to-face CBT were in remission compared with 19% of patients after continued GSH (p = 0.004). Using this stepped care model required less than six therapy sessions per patient and led to an overall remission rate of 63%.
Conclusions: Stepped care can be effective and resource-efficient to treat CMD in primary care, leading to high remission rates with limited therapist resources. Face-to-face CBT speeded up recovery compared with continued GSH. At follow-ups after 6 and 12 months, remission rates were similar in the two groups.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717003129 | DOI Listing |
Psychooncology
January 2025
West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University/Department of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Background: Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in improving depression in patients with cancer. However, diversity exists in the CBT delivery formats, and the optimal delivery format remains unconfirmed.
Objectives: To compare the efficacy of different delivery formats of CBT interventions on depression in patients with cancer.
Psychother Psychosom
January 2025
School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Introduction: This study aimed to determine the relative efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) or cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) in comparison to a waitlist control (WLC) for people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Participants completed assessments before and after treatment and at 6-month follow-up.
Methods: Two hundred and sixty-nine participants with RA were recruited and randomised in a 2:2:1 ratio to MBSR:CBT:WLC.
JMIR Ment Health
January 2025
Laboratoire SANPSY, CNRS, UMR 6033, Université de Bordeaux-Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pellegrin de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Background: Fully automated digital interventions delivered via smartphone apps have proven efficacious for a wide variety of mental health outcomes. An important aspect is that they are accessible at a low cost, thereby increasing their potential public impact and reducing disparities. However, a major challenge to their successful implementation is the phenomenon of users dropping out early.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Eat Disord
January 2025
Research, Equip Health Inc, Carlsbad, USA.
Objective: Treatment outcomes research for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) has been limited to small, mixed-age feasibility trials in face-to-face care settings. This study aims to examine clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in a large sample of youth and adult patients receiving virtual multidisciplinary team treatment for ARFID.
Method: The sample included N = 783 patients (532 youth and 251 adults) diagnosed with ARFID.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!