Testing Placement of Gastric Feeding Tubes in Infants.

Am J Crit Care

Norma A. Metheny is a professor of nursing at Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri. Ann Pawluszka is a research coordinator, Melanie Lulic is a research assistant, and Kathleen L. Meert is a professor of pediatrics and chief of critical care medicine at the Children's Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. Leslie J. Hinyard is an associate professor and associate director for academic affairs at the Center for Health Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University.

Published: November 2017

Background: Inadvertent positioning of a nasogastric tube in the lung can cause serious complications, so identifying methods to detect improperly inserted tubes is imperative.

Objectives: To compare the sensitivity, specificity, and negative and positive predictive values of 4 pH cut points (< 4.0, < 4.5, < 5.0, and < 5.5) in differentiating gastric and tracheal aspirates under various treatment conditions and to explore the utility of a pepsin assay for distinguishing between gastric and tracheal aspirates.

Methods: Gastric and tracheal aspirates were collected from critically ill infants undergoing mechanical ventilation who had nasogastric or orogastric feeding tubes. Aspirates were tested with colorimetric pH indicators and a rapid pepsin assay. Information about treatment conditions was obtained from medical records.

Results: Two hundred twelve gastric aspirates and 60 tracheal aspirates were collected from 212 patients. Sensitivity was highest and specificity was lowest at the gastric aspirate pH cut point of less than 5.5. Positive predictive values were 100% at all pH cut points less than 5.0. Negative predictive values were higher at the pH cut point of less than 5.0 than at cut points less than 4.5. A higher percentage of pepsin-positive readings was found in gastric aspirates (88.3%) than in tracheal aspirates (5.4%).

Conclusion: For a desired positive predictive value of 100%, a pH cut point of less than 5.0 provides the best negative predictive values, regardless of gastric acid inhibitor administration and feeding status. The pepsin assay is promising as an additional marker to distinguish gastric from tracheal aspirates.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2017378DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tracheal aspirates
20
predictive values
16
gastric tracheal
16
positive predictive
12
cut points
12
pepsin assay
12
cut point
12
gastric
9
feeding tubes
8
aspirates
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!